May 26, 2013

2013: Is Podcasting the Same as Radio?

2013: Is Podcasting the Same as Radio?

This episode is much more focused and becoming more like the vision that I have for the show. The topic this week gets back to my passion and that is the medium of “Podcasting”.  This show will target one specific topic each week.  These topics will...

Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon

This episode is much more focused and becoming more like the vision that I have for the show. The topic this week gets back to my passion and that is the medium of “Podcasting”. This show will target one specific topic each week. These topics will generally be about new media and podcasting, as it seems those topics are on my mind more then others. I will write an article then do an audio episode about it to go into more detail on the topic. In this episode, I discuss the long-running issue of “Is Podcasting the Same as Radio?”. I also wrote an blog post on this topic here about a week ago. Give it a read and then listen to the audio episode. Thank you Adrian Bacon and Daniel J. Lewis for contributing with comments that you will hear in this episode. Please feel free to give me feedback on this show to: rob at robgreenlee dotcom or twitter @robgreenlee . Leave some of your thoughts here in the comments and I will respond to them in next week episode.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.560 --> 00:00:05.960
Welcome to my Digital Life show for May twenty six,

2
00:00:06.040 --> 00:00:09.240
twenty thirteen. I'm Rob Greenley, and thank you for downloading

3
00:00:09.359 --> 00:00:12.759
or just clicking play off of my website at Rob

4
00:00:12.800 --> 00:00:17.399
Greenley dot com. This is episode two of the radio show.

5
00:00:18.640 --> 00:00:21.519
In this episode, I'd like to talk about the blog

6
00:00:21.559 --> 00:00:24.480
posts that I made here over the last week titled

7
00:00:24.719 --> 00:00:28.239
is podcasting the same as Radio? And I made this

8
00:00:28.359 --> 00:00:31.800
post and it seemed to have picked up a lot

9
00:00:31.839 --> 00:00:37.200
of podcaster interests on Twitter and Google Plus, and just

10
00:00:37.240 --> 00:00:39.280
wanted to expand on it a little bit on my

11
00:00:40.520 --> 00:00:44.119
new show that I've launched here. It's kind of an experiment,

12
00:00:44.240 --> 00:00:47.399
more of a personal show. But I can be reached

13
00:00:47.479 --> 00:00:51.240
at Rob at Rob Greenley dot com and that's r

14
00:00:51.520 --> 00:00:54.399
O B G R e E N L e E.

15
00:00:55.079 --> 00:00:59.759
Or I can be found on Twitter at Rob Greenley,

16
00:01:00.399 --> 00:01:04.879
or in iTunes or on Windows Phone podcast Area, which

17
00:01:04.879 --> 00:01:09.560
I manage for a small company called Microsoft. On Saturday mornings,

18
00:01:09.599 --> 00:01:13.359
I also co host the New Media Show from nine

19
00:01:13.439 --> 00:01:18.400
am to about ten thirty am Pacific Standard time with

20
00:01:18.560 --> 00:01:22.120
Todd Cochran, who's the CEO of Raw Voice, Blueberry and

21
00:01:22.879 --> 00:01:26.400
is the creator of power Press plug in for WordPress.

22
00:01:26.760 --> 00:01:31.040
And you can certainly catch that show live every Saturday

23
00:01:31.480 --> 00:01:36.719
at live dot Geeknewscentral dot com. So let's go ahead

24
00:01:36.760 --> 00:01:39.359
and dive into what I was talking about in my

25
00:01:39.439 --> 00:01:43.680
blog posts. I've been hearing quite a few kind of

26
00:01:43.680 --> 00:01:46.760
broadcast radio folks have been recently kind of plugged into

27
00:01:47.480 --> 00:01:50.599
listening to what people are talking about in the broadcast

28
00:01:50.680 --> 00:01:56.239
radio business, and specifically, my ear has been tweaked to

29
00:01:56.319 --> 00:02:01.040
listening for commentary about podcasting, and I've been hearing a

30
00:02:01.079 --> 00:02:05.079
lot of those folks starting to, you know, kind of

31
00:02:05.680 --> 00:02:09.479
welcome podcasting into their kind of broadcast radio world, and

32
00:02:09.560 --> 00:02:12.319
I definitely see a lot of trends around that. I

33
00:02:12.360 --> 00:02:16.159
get a feeling like they're kind of maybe a little

34
00:02:16.159 --> 00:02:18.479
bit trying to co opt it and try and fit

35
00:02:18.560 --> 00:02:22.719
it into their world instead of really understanding what the

36
00:02:22.759 --> 00:02:28.400
differences are between podcasting and broadcast radio. And they were

37
00:02:28.400 --> 00:02:31.960
commenting about how best to produce a podcast, and they're

38
00:02:32.080 --> 00:02:34.639
like creating these lists of the things that you have

39
00:02:34.719 --> 00:02:37.400
to do and how to best produce a podcast, and

40
00:02:37.439 --> 00:02:40.560
it's like, you know, I've been around podcasting for a

41
00:02:40.560 --> 00:02:42.759
long time, and I know a lot of people in

42
00:02:42.800 --> 00:02:45.360
this space that have been doing it a lot longer

43
00:02:45.400 --> 00:02:48.879
than a lot of broadcast radio people and have learned

44
00:02:48.879 --> 00:02:52.879
a lot over the years, and this topic really hits

45
00:02:53.039 --> 00:02:57.719
at a very core level of why radio and podcasting

46
00:02:57.800 --> 00:03:01.240
have not really been kind of more to each other

47
00:03:01.599 --> 00:03:05.439
and been kind of supported that the podcast community kind

48
00:03:05.479 --> 00:03:07.919
of shies away from the broadcast radio side, and the

49
00:03:07.919 --> 00:03:10.599
broadcast radio side tends to kind of shy away from

50
00:03:10.639 --> 00:03:14.039
getting involved in podcasting, and I think it really does

51
00:03:14.120 --> 00:03:16.039
get back to the fact that it's it's kind of

52
00:03:16.039 --> 00:03:18.800
a different culture, it's a different format. I think that

53
00:03:18.879 --> 00:03:23.439
the broadcast radio side tends to think that podcasting is

54
00:03:23.879 --> 00:03:27.400
kind of like not as professional as they are, and

55
00:03:27.520 --> 00:03:29.960
so they tend to put it in it's in a

56
00:03:30.240 --> 00:03:33.240
kind of a user generated content area, which in a

57
00:03:33.240 --> 00:03:36.960
lot of ways is accurate. I got the impression they're

58
00:03:37.000 --> 00:03:41.520
not really understanding why podcasting is significantly different than radio

59
00:03:42.039 --> 00:03:45.319
and it really is not the same medium. Lots of

60
00:03:45.360 --> 00:03:48.639
people have debated this issue and they've talked about why

61
00:03:48.759 --> 00:03:55.479
podcasting is is really just like radio, but it's not

62
00:03:55.599 --> 00:03:58.080
the same medium, and I have a couple of key

63
00:03:58.120 --> 00:04:00.919
points to point out of why it's not the same.

64
00:04:01.360 --> 00:04:06.840
First of all, podcasting the content segment concept that is

65
00:04:06.879 --> 00:04:11.599
also part of broadcast radio is not normally related to

66
00:04:11.719 --> 00:04:17.480
a commercial break, so broadcast radio is broken up into pieces.

67
00:04:17.560 --> 00:04:19.920
I did a broadcast radio show for many years and

68
00:04:20.360 --> 00:04:23.600
had to produce it in like four to six different

69
00:04:24.839 --> 00:04:28.800
down to the second segments. Believe me, I know as

70
00:04:28.800 --> 00:04:31.879
well as anybody how to produce a radio show, and

71
00:04:32.040 --> 00:04:35.519
producing a podcast is not like producing a radio show.

72
00:04:35.959 --> 00:04:39.279
This show is a perfect example what I'm doing right now.

73
00:04:39.720 --> 00:04:43.240
I have a structured topics list of what I cover

74
00:04:43.439 --> 00:04:47.879
in the show, and it's very structured, but it's not

75
00:04:48.040 --> 00:04:51.959
structured down to the second. That's what is really different.

76
00:04:52.399 --> 00:04:55.519
I used to have to edit my pre produced segments

77
00:04:55.560 --> 00:04:59.560
for broadcast radio down to the exact second. And I

78
00:04:59.560 --> 00:05:04.439
don't know if anybody in podcasting that actually records segments

79
00:05:04.560 --> 00:05:09.279
down to the second and then ads like exit music

80
00:05:09.800 --> 00:05:14.600
and lead outs and then comes back with lead ins

81
00:05:14.720 --> 00:05:17.360
and intro music and stuff. And that's exactly what I

82
00:05:17.480 --> 00:05:20.279
used to do, and it just doesn't It's not necessary

83
00:05:20.279 --> 00:05:22.839
in podcasting, and it creates a lot of disruption to

84
00:05:22.879 --> 00:05:27.040
the flow of the content for the audience. And that's

85
00:05:27.079 --> 00:05:30.279
why podcasting is better. We don't need to go backwards

86
00:05:30.319 --> 00:05:33.560
and make podcasting like radio, it doesn't have to be

87
00:05:33.639 --> 00:05:36.399
that way. Most of the ads and sponsor messages, and

88
00:05:36.439 --> 00:05:39.920
this is my next point, are best delivered as part

89
00:05:39.959 --> 00:05:43.120
of the flow of the regular content. Right, So, as

90
00:05:43.160 --> 00:05:46.480
you're talking about a topic like I'm talking about here,

91
00:05:47.279 --> 00:05:50.120
it's very easy to kind of roll into talking about

92
00:05:50.120 --> 00:05:53.399
a sponsor. So let's say I'm sponsored by Audible or

93
00:05:53.439 --> 00:05:58.279
somebody or GoDaddy or some sponsor, and they just deliver

94
00:05:58.480 --> 00:06:01.759
like maybe a twenty second kind of message about that

95
00:06:01.839 --> 00:06:05.480
sponsor and then immediately just kind of go back into

96
00:06:05.639 --> 00:06:11.040
talking about the content. Right. Well, that is done somewhat

97
00:06:11.079 --> 00:06:16.040
in broadcast radio. It's basically called a host read, and

98
00:06:16.800 --> 00:06:20.959
they do do that on occasion, but that's not where

99
00:06:21.000 --> 00:06:25.279
the majority of the advertising is played in broadcast radio.

100
00:06:25.519 --> 00:06:28.720
So that's kind of like special deals that happened between

101
00:06:29.439 --> 00:06:34.240
the host of the show and an advertiser that they

102
00:06:34.279 --> 00:06:38.560
want to get deeper engagement, which really exposes one aspect

103
00:06:38.639 --> 00:06:43.040
of podcasting that's very powerful, and that's the host read aspect.

104
00:06:43.120 --> 00:06:45.600
And you see a lot of successful podcasters doing this,

105
00:06:46.120 --> 00:06:51.199
and it's cutting out this whole segmented advertising breaks in

106
00:06:51.279 --> 00:06:55.040
the content to just focus on the type of delivery

107
00:06:55.279 --> 00:06:57.600
that a sponsor really wants. You know, I did a

108
00:06:57.639 --> 00:07:00.000
broadcast radio show for a long time, and the advertise

109
00:07:00.160 --> 00:07:03.600
are always wanted a host red spot over any kind

110
00:07:03.639 --> 00:07:06.360
of thirty second spot. That's what their primary. So you're

111
00:07:06.360 --> 00:07:10.160
going after the sweet spot by actually taking that content

112
00:07:10.480 --> 00:07:14.199
and wrapping it very closely with the advertiser instead of

113
00:07:14.199 --> 00:07:17.600
creating a break right that you break the attention to

114
00:07:17.639 --> 00:07:21.360
the audience. The audience maybe goes off and pays attention

115
00:07:21.399 --> 00:07:24.079
to something else, doesn't even listen to the ad They

116
00:07:24.079 --> 00:07:27.720
either go to the kitchen, or they on broadcast radio,

117
00:07:27.800 --> 00:07:31.199
they'll just turn the channel, right. It's it's about being

118
00:07:31.199 --> 00:07:34.480
more personal with you with your audience. My personal experience

119
00:07:34.560 --> 00:07:38.360
is a well produced podcast do have structure, and that

120
00:07:38.560 --> 00:07:42.279
structure is led by the content like what I'm doing here,

121
00:07:42.439 --> 00:07:45.639
and very loosely timed in the program. Sure, you can

122
00:07:45.680 --> 00:07:47.920
have a target for how long you want your show

123
00:07:47.959 --> 00:07:51.079
to be, but even that doesn't have to be tightly

124
00:07:51.879 --> 00:07:55.639
defined right because the audience doesn't really necessarily care. Though

125
00:07:55.680 --> 00:07:57.720
I did get a lot of feedback over the years

126
00:07:57.759 --> 00:08:00.959
with my own shows that are at their audience member

127
00:08:01.000 --> 00:08:03.959
would like your show to be fairly consistent in its length,

128
00:08:04.759 --> 00:08:08.279
not down to the second, but down to like maybe

129
00:08:09.120 --> 00:08:12.079
you shoot for like a thirty minute show each each week,

130
00:08:12.199 --> 00:08:14.399
or you shoot for a forty five minute show. If

131
00:08:14.439 --> 00:08:18.399
it goes forty minutes or it goes thirty five minutes,

132
00:08:18.920 --> 00:08:21.439
the audience really doesn't care about that, right, That's not

133
00:08:21.519 --> 00:08:25.000
what's important to them. But what's also important is being

134
00:08:25.040 --> 00:08:28.519
able to cover whatever topic and content that you want

135
00:08:28.560 --> 00:08:31.759
to cover, but also what you feel like you've completely

136
00:08:31.879 --> 00:08:34.960
covered for your audience. And if you produce your content

137
00:08:35.080 --> 00:08:39.360
to go after a certain period of time, then it's

138
00:08:39.879 --> 00:08:43.480
easier to make it all work for what the content

139
00:08:43.559 --> 00:08:46.960
producer wants and what the audience wants. And that's the key.

140
00:08:47.480 --> 00:08:51.799
So there is no reason to hit a certain time clock, right.

141
00:08:52.240 --> 00:08:54.799
And the thing about program length is is that it

142
00:08:55.320 --> 00:08:58.759
doesn't have to fit a standard model like radio. Give

143
00:08:58.840 --> 00:09:02.039
the length what the audience wants. No one size fits all,

144
00:09:03.000 --> 00:09:05.399
and it can also be different based on genre. So

145
00:09:05.480 --> 00:09:09.320
if I'm doing a podcast or a show about you know,

146
00:09:09.399 --> 00:09:11.360
it's like the one minute Bible or something like that,

147
00:09:11.519 --> 00:09:14.159
well it better be probably close to a minute, right.

148
00:09:15.000 --> 00:09:17.159
But if I'm doing a show like this, what I'm

149
00:09:17.200 --> 00:09:20.360
doing here is giving my thoughts in my opinion, it

150
00:09:20.480 --> 00:09:22.360
can be a ten minute show or it can be

151
00:09:22.440 --> 00:09:24.840
a fifteen minute show. It really doesn't make any difference.

152
00:09:24.919 --> 00:09:26.879
The audience just feels like they need to get something

153
00:09:26.919 --> 00:09:29.399
out of it. This discussion that I saw happening in

154
00:09:29.440 --> 00:09:33.840
the radio broadcast side was that all podcasts have to

155
00:09:33.919 --> 00:09:37.879
be short. This one I really take offense too, because

156
00:09:37.960 --> 00:09:44.320
it is completely misunderstanding the medium. Broadcast radio does, in

157
00:09:44.720 --> 00:09:48.799
a lot of situations tend to be short. But you

158
00:09:48.919 --> 00:09:51.519
can't take that same model and just say that's what

159
00:09:51.799 --> 00:09:54.879
works in another medium, and that's exactly what this is.

160
00:09:55.399 --> 00:09:57.679
It's fine to do a podcast at short, but my

161
00:09:57.879 --> 00:10:01.440
own experience is that doing a podcast that short doesn't

162
00:10:01.559 --> 00:10:03.720
have a lot of value in it, and it certainly

163
00:10:03.799 --> 00:10:07.240
doesn't have a lot of long term value. The whole

164
00:10:07.320 --> 00:10:10.159
question was, well, you know, if you do a long podcast,

165
00:10:10.279 --> 00:10:13.000
will anybody stick around to listen to it? Well, the

166
00:10:13.519 --> 00:10:16.799
truth the matter is that podcasts are about engagement. It's

167
00:10:16.840 --> 00:10:20.759
on demand medium. Typically, it's a more personal thing. People

168
00:10:20.960 --> 00:10:24.559
can start and stop this show, they can come back

169
00:10:24.600 --> 00:10:28.159
to it later. On broadcast radio when it airs, it

170
00:10:28.360 --> 00:10:32.840
basically airs and there is no repeat. Typically in broadcast radio.

171
00:10:32.919 --> 00:10:36.240
Now there are broadcast radio shows that do make their

172
00:10:36.279 --> 00:10:40.519
shows available as a podcast, but that's kind of rare. Really,

173
00:10:40.720 --> 00:10:44.200
the whole issue of podcasts not being caught up in

174
00:10:44.320 --> 00:10:48.000
this whole thing of that radio has of flipping channels, right,

175
00:10:48.159 --> 00:10:51.919
So that's the big thing that drives short content in

176
00:10:52.440 --> 00:10:55.240
radio is the fact that it's so easy for a

177
00:10:55.360 --> 00:10:57.879
listener to just change the channel, right, So they have

178
00:10:57.960 --> 00:11:01.639
to always be doing the hot, most popular thing at

179
00:11:01.679 --> 00:11:03.960
the moment, and it's always about here in the now,

180
00:11:04.039 --> 00:11:05.679
because if you don't do it, then you're going to

181
00:11:05.759 --> 00:11:08.840
lose them, right, You're gonna lose your audience. Well, podcasts

182
00:11:08.879 --> 00:11:12.200
are not like that. It's much more difficult for a

183
00:11:13.080 --> 00:11:16.960
listener to change the channel in podcasting because then they

184
00:11:17.039 --> 00:11:18.799
have to stop the episode. Then they have to go

185
00:11:18.919 --> 00:11:21.480
find a new episode. Though I would say that the

186
00:11:21.759 --> 00:11:26.440
future technology and podcasting will make podcasting a little bit

187
00:11:26.559 --> 00:11:30.840
more like radio in like a sequential playlist type of scenario,

188
00:11:31.399 --> 00:11:34.120
but it will still be on demand medium. So I know,

189
00:11:34.240 --> 00:11:36.679
I've talked about this a lot. To kind of wrap

190
00:11:36.759 --> 00:11:40.600
it up here on this topic, podcasts and broadcast radio

191
00:11:40.759 --> 00:11:45.320
can coexist. There's strengths and weaknesses on both sides of

192
00:11:45.360 --> 00:11:49.799
the fence, and podcasts can live with broadcast radio, but

193
00:11:49.960 --> 00:11:53.759
they can't be thought of as the same production. Right

194
00:11:54.240 --> 00:11:58.000
in an ideal world, there are successful podcasts that are

195
00:11:58.000 --> 00:12:01.559
broadcast radio shows that does to be more on the

196
00:12:01.679 --> 00:12:05.879
public radio side, which coincidentally doesn't have as many ads

197
00:12:06.320 --> 00:12:09.559
or ad breaks. So I would say the public radio

198
00:12:09.639 --> 00:12:13.200
side follows a little bit more with the model of

199
00:12:13.399 --> 00:12:18.919
podcasting than commercial radio does, which has this really dense

200
00:12:19.120 --> 00:12:22.399
level of commercial breaks to kind of boil it down.

201
00:12:22.879 --> 00:12:26.720
Both can coexist, but they're not the same medium, and

202
00:12:26.879 --> 00:12:30.039
that the broadcast radio folks need to dive in and

203
00:12:30.279 --> 00:12:35.159
educate themselves about how podcasting is different, and the podcasters

204
00:12:35.240 --> 00:12:37.919
need to dive in and learn some of the things

205
00:12:38.000 --> 00:12:41.879
that the broadcast radio folks can teach them around personality,

206
00:12:42.120 --> 00:12:46.960
around content, around how to be engaging and fun, and

207
00:12:47.080 --> 00:12:49.720
things like that which are very important to the success

208
00:12:49.759 --> 00:12:52.039
of podcasts. Now, I haven't brought a lot of fun

209
00:12:52.120 --> 00:12:55.080
and excitement to this podcast, but this is this is

210
00:12:55.080 --> 00:12:58.159
a fairly serious topic, and there's definitely room for serious

211
00:12:58.200 --> 00:13:02.120
topics and there's room for comedy topics. So I had

212
00:13:02.200 --> 00:13:07.200
a few folks online that are podcaster podcast consultants that

213
00:13:07.320 --> 00:13:11.000
gave some feedback on my article and my commentary here,

214
00:13:11.600 --> 00:13:15.840
and one was from mister Adrian Bacon. He says, I'll

215
00:13:15.879 --> 00:13:18.159
say the same thing I said on Twitter about this,

216
00:13:18.399 --> 00:13:22.080
No podcasts are the same as radio. They are two

217
00:13:22.240 --> 00:13:25.879
different but somewhat connected worlds. I definitely agree, and that

218
00:13:26.039 --> 00:13:29.360
follows along with what I said in the article. Daniel J.

219
00:13:29.600 --> 00:13:34.320
Lewis who does the Audacity to Podcast podcast He always

220
00:13:34.360 --> 00:13:38.480
gets really annoyed when when even podcasters call their shows

221
00:13:38.559 --> 00:13:42.600
online radio or some variant of that radio is something

222
00:13:42.720 --> 00:13:47.159
totally different technically than podcasting. The only time I mentioned

223
00:13:47.279 --> 00:13:50.600
radio is when I'm explaining what a podcast is to

224
00:13:50.720 --> 00:13:53.399
someone and I say that it's it's kind of like

225
00:13:53.559 --> 00:13:56.759
a radio talk show. That's some of the feedback. And

226
00:13:56.799 --> 00:14:00.480
I certainly want to get your feedback on my thoughts here,

227
00:14:00.639 --> 00:14:04.960
and we'll mention it on the show like I just did.

228
00:14:05.519 --> 00:14:08.799
So that's it for this week, and I'm Rob Greenley

229
00:14:08.879 --> 00:14:12.200
and I'm the podcast guy for a Windows Phone at Microsoft,

230
00:14:12.519 --> 00:14:15.120
And again, thank you for listening to my thoughts here.

231
00:14:15.480 --> 00:14:18.960
Please reach out to me and offer your thoughts on

232
00:14:19.519 --> 00:14:22.360
this topic and other topics that you think are important

233
00:14:22.399 --> 00:14:26.440
for me to cover. And you can reach me by

234
00:14:26.879 --> 00:14:30.639
sending me a tweet at Rob Greenley and that's r

235
00:14:30.679 --> 00:14:32.759
O B G R e E N L e E,

236
00:14:33.360 --> 00:14:36.440
or in the comments area of my roggreenley dot com

237
00:14:36.559 --> 00:14:39.480
comment area. And if you're a podcaster and you want

238
00:14:39.519 --> 00:14:43.080
to get your podcasts into the Windows Phone Podcast catalog,

239
00:14:43.480 --> 00:14:48.399
then shoot your feed to me at Podcasts and that's

240
00:14:48.440 --> 00:14:51.840
with an s at Microsoft dot com. And I'm also

241
00:14:52.000 --> 00:14:54.720
on Google Plus, LinkedIn, and Facebook, so look me up,

242
00:14:55.000 --> 00:14:59.200
or you can just email me Rob at Roggreenley dot com.

243
00:14:59.440 --> 00:15:01.799
So thank you very much for listening, and I look

244
00:15:01.879 --> 00:15:04.639
forward to having you back listening to the show next week.

245
00:15:04.759 --> 00:15:05.159
Bye bye,