Rebooting the Show: Video, AI and Revenue #643


In this episode, we relaunch the New Media Show #643 with special guest Rob Walsh, VP of Libsyn.
After a difficult last few months following the passing of longtime friend and co-host Todd Cochrane, The New Media Show officially returns with a fresh format and a familiar voice. In this reboot episode, we again talk candidly about the process of bringing the show back, honoring Todd’s legacy, and where the podcasting industry is really headed in 2025 and beyond.
Rob Greenlee and Rob Walch dig into the renewed 2026 Podcast Hall of Fame, why hosting it at Podfest Expo matters, and how this year’s inductee class reflects both the early pioneers and today’s global voices.
They unpack what advertisers are actually buying right now, why mid sized loyal shows often outperform the “big names,” and how the shift from demographic targeting to psychographic and genre based buying is changing deals for creators at every level.
The conversation also explores the rise of private communities and paid video ecosystems on platforms like Substack and Uscreen, plus the relaunch of NewMediaShow.com with a fully restored archive of nearly 600 past episodes.
From YouTube and Spotify’s “top podcast” charts to Apple’s long running audio ecosystem, the two Robs wrestle with a core question: what truly counts as a podcast in an era where many YouTube only shows get labeled as such.
They contrast audio first and video first strategies, debate download versus HLS streaming, and talk through how measurement, attribution, and IAB revenue reports reveal a still under valued ad market relative to radio and other media.
Finally, they tackle the current wave of AI generated ads and shows, including legal requirements around disclosure and why so much AI content still feels soulless, even as tools get faster and more powerful.
Whether you are an indie creator, a network executive, or someone who has followed The New Media Show for years, this reboot episode sets the tone for a new chapter that stays true to the show’s roots while leaning hard into the realities of today’s business of podcasting.
Rob Greenlee
Rob Greenlee website
https://RobGreenlee.com
New Media Show for Audio and Video RSS feeds
https://NewMediaShow.com
Adore Creator Network and shows hub
https://AdoreNetwork.com
Adore Creator Community on Skool
https://Skool.com/AdoreNetwork
Podcast Hall of Fame
https://PodcastHall.com
https://YouTube.com/@OfficialPodcastHallofFame
The Pro Creator Playbook with Rob Greenlee
Audio podcast
https://www.adorenetwork.com/show/pro-creator-playbook-audio/
Video show
https://www.adorenetwork.com/show/pro-creator-playbook-video/
Spoken Life Show
https://www.adorenetwork.com/show/spoken-life-show/
Spoken Human show on YouTube
https://YouTube.com/@spokenhuman
Rob Greenlee YouTube channel
https://YouTube.com/@RobGreenlee
Rob Walch
Libsyn podcast hosting and network
https://libsyn.com
Podcast411 with Rob Walch
https://podcast411.com
The post Rebooting the Show: Video, AI and Revenue #643 first appeared on New Media Show.
00:00:08,320 --> 00:00:12,240
Welcome to the reboot of the new media
2
00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:14,855
show, and it's great to have you here
3
00:00:14,855 --> 00:00:15,994
with me. And
4
00:00:16,454 --> 00:00:17,994
today on the relaunch
5
00:00:18,454 --> 00:00:19,274
of the show,
6
00:00:19,654 --> 00:00:20,795
but we're going to,
7
00:00:21,335 --> 00:00:22,695
be in a little bit of a different
8
00:00:22,695 --> 00:00:23,195
format,
9
00:00:23,654 --> 00:00:26,134
than what the conventional approach has been. I've
10
00:00:26,134 --> 00:00:29,500
got, Rob Walsh, the VP of Libsyn with
11
00:00:29,500 --> 00:00:31,179
me. And so he's,
12
00:00:31,739 --> 00:00:34,140
gonna gonna join me on this journey as
13
00:00:34,140 --> 00:00:35,600
we kind of move to the next
14
00:00:35,899 --> 00:00:37,119
stage of the
15
00:00:37,500 --> 00:00:39,979
the new media show. And so, Rob, welcome
16
00:00:39,979 --> 00:00:41,744
back. I guess the the last time I
17
00:00:41,744 --> 00:00:43,185
did this new media show, you were on
18
00:00:43,185 --> 00:00:44,945
it as well. Thanks, Rob, for having me
19
00:00:44,945 --> 00:00:46,945
on. Appreciate it. It's been a couple of
20
00:00:46,945 --> 00:00:49,984
months since Todd left us, and and it's
21
00:00:49,984 --> 00:00:51,204
been a a process
22
00:00:51,744 --> 00:00:53,284
to rebuild this
23
00:00:53,609 --> 00:00:54,109
show
24
00:00:54,729 --> 00:00:57,530
and to have it, kind of ready for
25
00:00:57,530 --> 00:00:59,049
a relaunch. I mean, at the time, I
26
00:00:59,049 --> 00:01:00,969
didn't really know if I was going to
27
00:01:00,969 --> 00:01:03,369
bring the show back or not. It didn't
28
00:01:03,449 --> 00:01:05,049
I didn't know if it was gonna be
29
00:01:05,049 --> 00:01:07,390
even even possible. So it's
30
00:01:07,704 --> 00:01:08,204
really
31
00:01:08,584 --> 00:01:10,584
a a miracle to some degree that that
32
00:01:10,584 --> 00:01:12,825
we're back doing it here. I'm glad I'm
33
00:01:12,825 --> 00:01:15,625
glad you're relaunching. Yeah. Well, it's great that
34
00:01:15,625 --> 00:01:17,784
it's coming back. And and so what I'm
35
00:01:17,784 --> 00:01:20,204
hoping to do with the show here is
36
00:01:20,344 --> 00:01:22,045
talk about some some
37
00:01:22,519 --> 00:01:25,239
topics that that are top of mind right
38
00:01:25,239 --> 00:01:27,159
now, you know, like the podcast hall theme
39
00:01:27,159 --> 00:01:29,399
and and kind of what what's going on
40
00:01:29,399 --> 00:01:32,920
with the whole video side, AI side, and
41
00:01:32,920 --> 00:01:33,739
what that,
42
00:01:34,484 --> 00:01:35,385
how that's impacting
43
00:01:35,924 --> 00:01:39,365
the podcasting space. So, Rob, what's your thought
44
00:01:39,365 --> 00:01:41,045
on the whole hall of fame? Is there
45
00:01:41,045 --> 00:01:43,284
any comments that that they have? It's coming
46
00:01:43,284 --> 00:01:43,685
back.
47
00:01:44,325 --> 00:01:46,585
I'm gonna be having 12 new inductees
48
00:01:47,150 --> 00:01:49,390
They're hopefully gonna be announced here in the
49
00:01:49,390 --> 00:01:49,870
next,
50
00:01:50,189 --> 00:01:53,010
day or so, but it's it's really exciting
51
00:01:53,229 --> 00:01:55,469
to to see that come back as well.
52
00:01:55,469 --> 00:01:57,709
So any thoughts? Yeah. I mean, first, I'm
53
00:01:57,709 --> 00:02:00,510
I'm excited that coming back, I'm always happy
54
00:02:00,510 --> 00:02:01,569
to see the new inductees.
55
00:02:02,034 --> 00:02:03,575
Yeah. You know,
56
00:02:04,114 --> 00:02:06,034
good class from the ones I've seen so
57
00:02:06,034 --> 00:02:06,534
far.
58
00:02:07,474 --> 00:02:10,754
One I'm good friends with. So very happy
59
00:02:10,754 --> 00:02:12,754
for him. I don't know. We'll we'll talk
60
00:02:12,754 --> 00:02:14,514
about names here in a little bit. But,
61
00:02:14,835 --> 00:02:16,930
yeah, I I it it's nice to see
62
00:02:16,930 --> 00:02:18,450
it moving forward. It is nice to see
63
00:02:18,450 --> 00:02:20,610
it being back to a yearly cadence and
64
00:02:20,610 --> 00:02:23,010
and really happy that podcast is, you know,
65
00:02:23,010 --> 00:02:25,170
stepping up and Yeah. Making it part of
66
00:02:25,170 --> 00:02:27,730
of that show. Yeah. I think it's my
67
00:02:27,730 --> 00:02:28,770
personal thought is it's,
68
00:02:29,605 --> 00:02:32,085
it's something that's really important to the medium
69
00:02:32,085 --> 00:02:33,944
to recognize those folks that
70
00:02:34,325 --> 00:02:35,865
had a had a foundational
71
00:02:36,724 --> 00:02:39,205
billing for for this medium that we all
72
00:02:39,205 --> 00:02:41,385
love. And and so it's great to,
73
00:02:42,085 --> 00:02:44,085
always always do this event. It's always a
74
00:02:44,085 --> 00:02:44,825
lot of work.
75
00:02:45,409 --> 00:02:47,909
There's always a lot of, trying to coordinate
76
00:02:48,290 --> 00:02:50,210
people flying in or if they're gonna be
77
00:02:50,210 --> 00:02:52,210
there, if they're gonna do doing doing a
78
00:02:52,210 --> 00:02:52,710
video.
79
00:02:53,169 --> 00:02:53,569
But it's
80
00:02:54,210 --> 00:02:55,889
I would say at the end, it's always
81
00:02:55,889 --> 00:02:58,735
worth it. So and that's that's why we
82
00:02:58,735 --> 00:03:00,514
do it. So well,
83
00:03:00,814 --> 00:03:03,215
let's kinda move on here and talk a
84
00:03:03,215 --> 00:03:05,375
little bit about some of the other topics
85
00:03:05,375 --> 00:03:06,814
that that we're gonna talk about on the
86
00:03:06,814 --> 00:03:09,534
show today. And that's kinda some what can
87
00:03:09,534 --> 00:03:10,194
be oftentimes
88
00:03:10,495 --> 00:03:10,995
controversial
89
00:03:11,294 --> 00:03:11,794
numbers
90
00:03:12,230 --> 00:03:14,710
around ad spend and the business side of
91
00:03:14,710 --> 00:03:16,889
podcasting is one of the things
92
00:03:17,590 --> 00:03:19,909
that, you know, and Rob, you know, chime
93
00:03:19,909 --> 00:03:20,889
in on this too
94
00:03:21,189 --> 00:03:23,449
is is that it it feels like podcasting
95
00:03:23,510 --> 00:03:26,474
has kinda grown up of sorts, and it's
96
00:03:26,555 --> 00:03:28,415
it's now being seen increasingly
97
00:03:29,675 --> 00:03:32,395
as the media now. Right? So we've spent
98
00:03:32,395 --> 00:03:34,175
most of our lives, both of us,
99
00:03:34,715 --> 00:03:36,335
seeing mainstream media
100
00:03:36,795 --> 00:03:40,139
really kinda kinda dominate the media landscape. And
101
00:03:40,139 --> 00:03:42,299
podcasting has always been this kinda like this
102
00:03:42,299 --> 00:03:45,439
rebel upstart, but but now we've kind of
103
00:03:45,739 --> 00:03:47,840
taken over that leading mantle
104
00:03:48,139 --> 00:03:48,799
of sorts
105
00:03:49,180 --> 00:03:51,599
in the podcasting space. And so
106
00:03:51,995 --> 00:03:53,435
what's your thought on that? Is that the
107
00:03:53,435 --> 00:03:54,954
same thing that you're seeing, or is it
108
00:03:54,954 --> 00:03:56,254
just something I'm seeing?
109
00:03:56,715 --> 00:03:58,794
Obviously, something that I'm seeing too. And, you
110
00:03:58,794 --> 00:04:00,954
know, we had an election a year ago
111
00:04:00,954 --> 00:04:02,254
that was dominated
112
00:04:02,634 --> 00:04:04,094
by podcast appearances
113
00:04:04,555 --> 00:04:07,259
and lack thereof. I mean, definitely helped,
114
00:04:09,019 --> 00:04:10,319
determine a present.
115
00:04:11,099 --> 00:04:12,780
And then on top of that, you have
116
00:04:12,780 --> 00:04:16,319
one podcaster who's bigger than all, you know,
117
00:04:16,379 --> 00:04:16,879
CNN,
118
00:04:17,259 --> 00:04:18,319
Fox News,
119
00:04:18,939 --> 00:04:19,439
NewsNation,
120
00:04:20,794 --> 00:04:21,294
MSNBC
121
00:04:21,914 --> 00:04:24,414
combined his audience's longer. So
122
00:04:24,794 --> 00:04:27,675
what is mainstream media when you've got Joe
123
00:04:27,675 --> 00:04:28,574
Rogan, who's
124
00:04:28,875 --> 00:04:30,414
larger than Anderson Cooper?
125
00:04:30,875 --> 00:04:33,594
That's right. Well, and it's probably not even
126
00:04:33,594 --> 00:04:36,220
close, actually. And there's a handful of other
127
00:04:36,220 --> 00:04:37,979
creators, and I've got a list that I'm
128
00:04:37,979 --> 00:04:39,500
gonna share a little bit later in the
129
00:04:39,500 --> 00:04:40,639
show that will kind
130
00:04:40,939 --> 00:04:43,500
of run down what those top 10 shows
131
00:04:43,500 --> 00:04:45,919
are right now at Spotify and even Apple
132
00:04:46,379 --> 00:04:49,519
and YouTube. So, you know, and it's not,
133
00:04:50,115 --> 00:04:52,134
what I think all of us would necessarily
134
00:04:52,754 --> 00:04:55,395
like to see, but it's the, it's the
135
00:04:55,395 --> 00:04:57,395
reality that we see right now, at least
136
00:04:57,395 --> 00:05:00,055
in the numbers that are being shared publicly.
137
00:05:00,514 --> 00:05:01,014
And
138
00:05:01,555 --> 00:05:02,455
which is always
139
00:05:02,835 --> 00:05:04,295
a question mark too,
140
00:05:04,949 --> 00:05:06,629
is that each of those platforms kind of
141
00:05:06,629 --> 00:05:06,949
has,
142
00:05:07,670 --> 00:05:09,829
reasons for doing things. I'll just put it
143
00:05:09,829 --> 00:05:10,949
kindly that way.
144
00:05:11,829 --> 00:05:12,810
So, so anyway,
145
00:05:13,509 --> 00:05:15,990
I don't know, Rob, what's what's the big
146
00:05:15,990 --> 00:05:17,449
things that you're seeing
147
00:05:18,014 --> 00:05:19,774
on the growth side that's really
148
00:05:20,254 --> 00:05:23,535
Advertising side is it's it's more and more
149
00:05:23,535 --> 00:05:25,154
advertisers are coming in.
150
00:05:25,615 --> 00:05:26,514
Yeah. And
151
00:05:27,134 --> 00:05:29,294
we're getting I think we're starting to see
152
00:05:29,294 --> 00:05:29,794
advertisers
153
00:05:30,620 --> 00:05:31,519
change even
154
00:05:32,060 --> 00:05:34,319
on pre produced ads on how they're targeting.
155
00:05:34,860 --> 00:05:36,779
Initially, it was a lot of targeting based
156
00:05:36,779 --> 00:05:39,419
on the demographics of who the listeners are,
157
00:05:39,419 --> 00:05:41,099
but now you're starting to see them go,
158
00:05:41,099 --> 00:05:42,000
wait a second.
159
00:05:42,379 --> 00:05:44,560
Why am I targeting on
160
00:05:45,084 --> 00:05:48,365
demographics when I actually care about psychographics? And
161
00:05:48,365 --> 00:05:49,345
then they're saying, hey,
162
00:05:49,964 --> 00:05:52,125
why don't I, you know, why don't I
163
00:05:52,125 --> 00:05:54,125
just put it all across all these true
164
00:05:54,125 --> 00:05:55,564
crime or why don't I put it across
165
00:05:55,564 --> 00:05:58,399
all these sports podcasts? Doesn't matter what their
166
00:05:58,399 --> 00:06:01,120
demographics are. If they're interested in this topic,
167
00:06:01,120 --> 00:06:02,500
they're interested in my product.
168
00:06:02,959 --> 00:06:05,199
And then we're starting to see that shift
169
00:06:05,199 --> 00:06:06,180
come back now.
170
00:06:07,600 --> 00:06:09,779
You know, still host red is still dominant,
171
00:06:10,264 --> 00:06:13,805
but programmatic, I thought, a bit was so
172
00:06:14,185 --> 00:06:15,085
more reliant
173
00:06:15,464 --> 00:06:17,305
on they would they were so interested on
174
00:06:17,305 --> 00:06:19,865
the demos. They forgot about well, does it
175
00:06:19,865 --> 00:06:21,785
really matter if that person is a male
176
00:06:21,785 --> 00:06:23,459
or female if they're not gonna buy your
177
00:06:23,459 --> 00:06:26,680
product? So I've seen this year, especially,
178
00:06:27,459 --> 00:06:29,399
more of those would call run of network
179
00:06:29,459 --> 00:06:31,699
type buys where they'll buy across a whole
180
00:06:31,699 --> 00:06:34,759
genre of podcast because they know those people
181
00:06:35,185 --> 00:06:37,764
that listen to it, regardless of gender, regardless
182
00:06:37,904 --> 00:06:40,305
of age, are likely to buy their product
183
00:06:40,305 --> 00:06:42,464
because of the topic they're listening to. Yeah.
184
00:06:42,464 --> 00:06:43,024
It does,
185
00:06:43,664 --> 00:06:45,044
seem like that the advertising
186
00:06:45,425 --> 00:06:45,925
side,
187
00:06:47,024 --> 00:06:49,104
is really moving a little bit closer to
188
00:06:49,104 --> 00:06:49,764
what we've
189
00:06:50,860 --> 00:06:53,500
accepted, I guess, or or seen in the
190
00:06:53,500 --> 00:06:56,459
broadcast media side. Right? For many years. That's
191
00:06:56,459 --> 00:06:58,220
the irony as I look back to the
192
00:06:58,220 --> 00:07:00,620
past is is what we went through this
193
00:07:00,620 --> 00:07:02,620
phase with podcasting, and I think it still
194
00:07:02,620 --> 00:07:03,839
exists today where
195
00:07:04,264 --> 00:07:07,305
where host reads do do very well. It's
196
00:07:07,305 --> 00:07:07,964
been able
197
00:07:08,264 --> 00:07:09,165
to Right. And
198
00:07:10,105 --> 00:07:10,605
advertisers
199
00:07:11,625 --> 00:07:12,685
are really increasingly
200
00:07:12,985 --> 00:07:15,384
starting to think about, well, what's the ROI
201
00:07:15,384 --> 00:07:18,019
on these things? Right? And that's what's causing
202
00:07:18,560 --> 00:07:20,800
a little bit of an adjustment in the
203
00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:21,300
medium
204
00:07:21,759 --> 00:07:22,659
around expectations
205
00:07:22,959 --> 00:07:26,079
because, you know, they would like to only
206
00:07:26,079 --> 00:07:28,740
work with shows that drive the highest ROI,
207
00:07:28,879 --> 00:07:30,419
right, on their campaigns.
208
00:07:30,914 --> 00:07:33,555
That tends to narrow the the amount of
209
00:07:33,555 --> 00:07:35,814
shows that are being being purchased.
210
00:07:36,194 --> 00:07:38,595
And And are you doing that as well?
211
00:07:38,595 --> 00:07:39,414
Yeah. I mean,
212
00:07:40,034 --> 00:07:42,034
some buyers will like, hey. I only want
213
00:07:42,034 --> 00:07:43,954
shows a 100,000, a 150,000,
214
00:07:43,954 --> 00:07:45,954
or 200,000 per app. Right? Because they don't
215
00:07:45,954 --> 00:07:47,629
wanna deal with shows that are
216
00:07:48,089 --> 00:07:50,750
smaller. But others are realizing that, hey, there's
217
00:07:51,209 --> 00:07:54,490
really actually better ROI oftentimes between shows that
218
00:07:54,490 --> 00:07:56,410
are between $1,015,000
219
00:07:56,410 --> 00:07:57,629
and a 100,000.
220
00:07:57,689 --> 00:08:00,329
Those those audiences tend to be much more
221
00:08:00,329 --> 00:08:02,175
loyal to to the hosts
222
00:08:02,574 --> 00:08:04,175
than some of the ones that are, you
223
00:08:04,175 --> 00:08:06,974
know, bigger shows. I'm not gonna name names,
224
00:08:06,974 --> 00:08:08,894
but bigger shows that are up there that
225
00:08:08,894 --> 00:08:10,354
never listen to this
226
00:08:10,735 --> 00:08:12,435
a voice mail message, never,
227
00:08:13,534 --> 00:08:15,534
reply to the audience, never interact with the
228
00:08:15,534 --> 00:08:17,509
audience. But the shows that are 25,
229
00:08:17,509 --> 00:08:20,069
50 k, they tend to still be interacting
230
00:08:20,069 --> 00:08:22,149
with their audience and pull them a better
231
00:08:22,149 --> 00:08:23,990
rapport with that audience. Yeah. And it does
232
00:08:23,990 --> 00:08:26,069
seem like more and more shows are taking
233
00:08:26,069 --> 00:08:26,569
their,
234
00:08:27,029 --> 00:08:30,490
their platform or their content to private communities
235
00:08:30,709 --> 00:08:31,849
increasingly too.
236
00:08:32,205 --> 00:08:35,404
It's usually around bonus content, but Substack. I've
237
00:08:35,404 --> 00:08:37,164
seen a lot of shows going around sub
238
00:08:37,164 --> 00:08:39,565
stack. Yeah. That's a that's a great example,
239
00:08:39,565 --> 00:08:42,065
but there's other ones too, like, you screen,
240
00:08:42,764 --> 00:08:45,085
dot TV is another one that we're seeing
241
00:08:45,085 --> 00:08:45,585
people
242
00:08:46,019 --> 00:08:47,940
post all their videos over there. So you
243
00:08:47,940 --> 00:08:50,340
could conceivably have an audio show that's only
244
00:08:50,340 --> 00:08:50,840
available
245
00:08:51,300 --> 00:08:53,860
publicly and then do all your video over
246
00:08:53,860 --> 00:08:57,060
in these these more private communities, right, that
247
00:08:57,060 --> 00:08:59,235
you can build a paid relationship with
248
00:09:00,034 --> 00:09:01,254
with a particular show.
249
00:09:01,794 --> 00:09:04,274
But Rob, before we dive too much further
250
00:09:04,274 --> 00:09:05,794
into this, because we have a lot of
251
00:09:05,794 --> 00:09:07,714
data that we wanna share on the show
252
00:09:07,714 --> 00:09:09,634
today too, that I'm gonna pull up on
253
00:09:09,634 --> 00:09:12,595
the screen around the ad spend market, in
254
00:09:12,595 --> 00:09:14,519
The US and globally. But I did wanna
255
00:09:14,519 --> 00:09:17,240
share that the the New Media Show has
256
00:09:17,240 --> 00:09:20,600
a new website. So if you are seeing
257
00:09:20,600 --> 00:09:22,840
this live so let me bring it up
258
00:09:22,840 --> 00:09:24,600
on the screen here. So if you wanted
259
00:09:24,600 --> 00:09:25,500
to go to
260
00:09:26,475 --> 00:09:28,095
newmediashow.com,
261
00:09:28,315 --> 00:09:30,715
you can actually get all of the older
262
00:09:30,715 --> 00:09:31,695
older episodes
263
00:09:32,154 --> 00:09:34,654
of which there's probably close to 600
264
00:09:34,794 --> 00:09:37,115
up in here right now. And if you
265
00:09:37,115 --> 00:09:39,995
missed the the episode that Rob and I
266
00:09:39,995 --> 00:09:40,679
both did
267
00:09:41,320 --> 00:09:42,940
to to remember Todd Cochran,
268
00:09:43,879 --> 00:09:46,279
that's all up here too, and there's audio
269
00:09:46,279 --> 00:09:49,159
and and video players that are on that
270
00:09:49,159 --> 00:09:51,480
post as well. Those are now in the
271
00:09:51,480 --> 00:09:54,495
RSS feeds, the older RSS feeds that didn't
272
00:09:54,495 --> 00:09:57,715
get updated originally with that episode. So
273
00:09:58,095 --> 00:10:00,095
so we've been able to restore the whole
274
00:10:00,095 --> 00:10:00,595
show
275
00:10:01,134 --> 00:10:03,215
and get all of the archives in here
276
00:10:03,215 --> 00:10:05,394
too. So all of the the new episodes
277
00:10:05,455 --> 00:10:07,295
will be published in here just like this.
278
00:10:07,295 --> 00:10:09,870
And so this will be a good kind
279
00:10:09,870 --> 00:10:10,610
of landing,
280
00:10:11,389 --> 00:10:11,889
location
281
00:10:13,070 --> 00:10:15,790
for for the show going forward. And so
282
00:10:15,790 --> 00:10:18,110
so but it's still gonna be available and
283
00:10:18,110 --> 00:10:20,830
streamed live out to all of the social
284
00:10:20,830 --> 00:10:21,330
platforms.
285
00:10:22,065 --> 00:10:24,644
I am tapping into Todd's old,
286
00:10:25,184 --> 00:10:26,485
old link through
287
00:10:26,945 --> 00:10:27,445
Restream.
288
00:10:28,065 --> 00:10:30,144
Hopefully, it's working. I'm not really sure if
289
00:10:30,144 --> 00:10:32,304
it is, but I'll find out after the
290
00:10:32,304 --> 00:10:32,804
show,
291
00:10:33,345 --> 00:10:35,264
to try and capture as many,
292
00:10:36,330 --> 00:10:39,210
potential listening points for this show as well.
293
00:10:39,210 --> 00:10:41,210
But I'm sure some of them aren't gonna
294
00:10:41,210 --> 00:10:42,090
work, but,
295
00:10:42,570 --> 00:10:44,170
I'm hoping that some of them will, and
296
00:10:44,170 --> 00:10:46,889
it'll capture people that have probably not seen
297
00:10:46,889 --> 00:10:48,410
the show in a long time. I wonder
298
00:10:48,410 --> 00:10:50,605
what happened to it. Right. So and then,
299
00:10:51,164 --> 00:10:53,345
so I just wanted to show that there's
300
00:10:53,644 --> 00:10:55,884
ways that you you can actually go back
301
00:10:55,884 --> 00:10:58,204
in here. And I mean, well, first of
302
00:10:58,204 --> 00:11:00,225
all, you can go on and and subscribe
303
00:11:01,084 --> 00:11:03,184
to Apple Podcasts or Spotify
304
00:11:03,950 --> 00:11:07,090
and get access to to the content there
305
00:11:07,470 --> 00:11:09,309
and get it on your phone. And then
306
00:11:09,309 --> 00:11:13,629
also there's a complete list by by, month
307
00:11:13,629 --> 00:11:14,370
and year
308
00:11:14,830 --> 00:11:17,325
of all the past past episodes. If you
309
00:11:17,325 --> 00:11:19,325
wanted to go into a deep dive of
310
00:11:19,325 --> 00:11:21,884
seeing what one of the early episodes of
311
00:11:21,884 --> 00:11:23,725
this series is, you can see how long
312
00:11:23,725 --> 00:11:25,024
that list is. It's about,
313
00:11:25,404 --> 00:11:27,965
like I said, close to 600 episodes. So
314
00:11:27,965 --> 00:11:29,804
if you have lots of extra time in
315
00:11:29,804 --> 00:11:31,740
your life, which probably most people don't.
316
00:11:32,620 --> 00:11:34,399
So this is a little bit more personal,
317
00:11:34,700 --> 00:11:35,200
Rob.
318
00:11:35,659 --> 00:11:37,679
It's it it it, like, shows us parallel
319
00:11:37,820 --> 00:11:39,279
with with each other. I know
320
00:11:39,659 --> 00:11:40,559
the the past
321
00:11:40,940 --> 00:11:41,440
show,
322
00:11:42,299 --> 00:11:44,834
had us in various sizes and things like
323
00:11:44,834 --> 00:11:46,834
that, but I just love the that this
324
00:11:46,834 --> 00:11:49,315
parallel look. Now granted, I can flip back
325
00:11:49,315 --> 00:11:50,454
and forth to
326
00:11:50,754 --> 00:11:53,394
to me and then you and in that
327
00:11:53,394 --> 00:11:55,154
that concept, which is terrific. But,
328
00:11:56,195 --> 00:11:58,514
And for those that are watching after and
329
00:11:58,514 --> 00:12:01,460
don't realize, we're using StreamYard. So Yeah. Right.
330
00:12:01,460 --> 00:12:02,919
And need what service.
331
00:12:03,379 --> 00:12:05,940
So what we're doing here is hopefully will
332
00:12:05,940 --> 00:12:06,679
work well
333
00:12:07,220 --> 00:12:09,379
on the audio side and and the video
334
00:12:09,379 --> 00:12:11,700
side is my goal always. So anything we
335
00:12:11,700 --> 00:12:14,274
bring up on the screen, you know, we're
336
00:12:14,274 --> 00:12:16,514
gonna talk about. So it isn't so much,
337
00:12:16,754 --> 00:12:19,235
that it's only being created for the video
338
00:12:19,235 --> 00:12:21,394
of consumers of this because that's the other
339
00:12:21,394 --> 00:12:23,174
thing that I've learned over the last,
340
00:12:23,554 --> 00:12:26,375
couple of years is that is that increasingly
341
00:12:26,595 --> 00:12:30,089
people are looking for an audio version and
342
00:12:30,389 --> 00:12:30,889
potentially
343
00:12:31,509 --> 00:12:34,230
as an option, a video word. So there
344
00:12:34,230 --> 00:12:35,669
are people out there that like to watch
345
00:12:35,669 --> 00:12:38,889
video, which are typically a smaller subset.
346
00:12:39,589 --> 00:12:42,014
I think the the numbers that Todd shared
347
00:12:42,014 --> 00:12:43,855
with me in the past, because we've been
348
00:12:43,855 --> 00:12:45,855
doing this as a live show for thirteen
349
00:12:45,855 --> 00:12:48,574
years, is that it's like 10 to 20%
350
00:12:48,574 --> 00:12:51,294
of the audience watches the video side. That's
351
00:12:51,294 --> 00:12:52,815
not what we did. Score a lot of
352
00:12:52,815 --> 00:12:55,315
show. Oh, it is. Right. Some shows,
353
00:12:55,694 --> 00:12:57,820
the ratio is 20 to one. I mean,
354
00:12:57,820 --> 00:12:58,879
while the podcast
355
00:12:59,259 --> 00:13:01,019
that we see is 20 to one ratio
356
00:13:01,019 --> 00:13:02,159
of audio to video.
357
00:13:02,700 --> 00:13:04,860
Yeah. And that's why I care about them,
358
00:13:04,860 --> 00:13:06,720
the actual production of this and
359
00:13:07,500 --> 00:13:10,139
and how it's how it's presented. Is it
360
00:13:10,139 --> 00:13:10,639
visually,
361
00:13:11,100 --> 00:13:12,959
you know, enticing? I was a little bit,
362
00:13:14,035 --> 00:13:16,035
a little disappointed because I was trying to
363
00:13:16,035 --> 00:13:18,915
shoot for four k here with with what
364
00:13:18,915 --> 00:13:21,735
I'm trying to do, but the technology platforms
365
00:13:21,795 --> 00:13:23,634
are still not quite there yet to four
366
00:13:23,634 --> 00:13:26,035
k. Now, granted, YouTube is playing in that
367
00:13:26,035 --> 00:13:27,254
four k market
368
00:13:27,779 --> 00:13:29,940
pretty deeply, but most of the content that
369
00:13:29,940 --> 00:13:30,759
gets published,
370
00:13:31,299 --> 00:13:32,820
or I just say all of it, that's
371
00:13:32,820 --> 00:13:35,480
four k gets published as a direct upload.
372
00:13:35,860 --> 00:13:37,559
There isn't any four k. Yeah.
373
00:13:38,019 --> 00:13:40,500
Yeah. Any live streams that are going into
374
00:13:40,500 --> 00:13:42,200
YouTube that are four k today,
375
00:13:42,865 --> 00:13:45,985
they default it, and and so does so
376
00:13:45,985 --> 00:13:48,245
does StreamYard as far as I know. So,
377
00:13:48,944 --> 00:13:51,284
so anyway, just a little bit of background
378
00:13:51,584 --> 00:13:52,865
background story. But,
379
00:13:55,024 --> 00:13:55,345
let's
380
00:13:56,840 --> 00:13:57,899
is there any thoughts,
381
00:13:58,679 --> 00:14:02,299
Rob, on Todd's passing that you've had subsequent
382
00:14:02,679 --> 00:14:03,179
to
383
00:14:03,879 --> 00:14:04,360
to,
384
00:14:05,000 --> 00:14:08,279
the your remembrance episode that that we might
385
00:14:08,279 --> 00:14:09,225
wanna talk about?
386
00:14:10,105 --> 00:14:11,084
No. I mean, since,
387
00:14:12,345 --> 00:14:13,784
you know, I saw you at the funeral
388
00:14:13,784 --> 00:14:16,345
and and and it was great turnout and
389
00:14:16,345 --> 00:14:18,345
it was great seeing folks there. I'm a
390
00:14:18,345 --> 00:14:20,184
horrible reason to see them, but it it
391
00:14:20,184 --> 00:14:21,944
was really nice to see that turnout for
392
00:14:21,944 --> 00:14:22,444
Todd.
393
00:14:24,059 --> 00:14:26,620
Yeah. Yeah. It just it's still very sad.
394
00:14:26,620 --> 00:14:27,899
I think and I always said it was
395
00:14:27,980 --> 00:14:29,899
it's gonna hit me more, like, when I
396
00:14:29,899 --> 00:14:31,820
get to podcast, when I'm there and you
397
00:14:31,820 --> 00:14:33,580
see the bluebird Right. Blankens. You won't see
398
00:14:33,580 --> 00:14:35,120
Todd. And I think that's
399
00:14:35,580 --> 00:14:37,179
I think that's gonna be more of the
400
00:14:37,179 --> 00:14:38,480
reality of the situation,
401
00:14:39,205 --> 00:14:40,644
when it gets home with a lot of
402
00:14:40,644 --> 00:14:42,404
people for that point. You know, they're used
403
00:14:42,404 --> 00:14:44,184
to seeing them there. Those of that.
404
00:14:45,044 --> 00:14:45,865
Yeah. So,
405
00:14:46,404 --> 00:14:47,464
speaking of Podfest,
406
00:14:48,085 --> 00:14:49,845
there's a bunch of stuff that's gonna be
407
00:14:49,845 --> 00:14:50,985
going on down there.
408
00:14:51,690 --> 00:14:53,929
I'm a big, big fan of Podfest and
409
00:14:53,929 --> 00:14:55,769
what they're trying to accomplish down there. That
410
00:14:55,769 --> 00:14:56,830
that that's it. Podfest,
411
00:14:57,769 --> 00:14:58,809
expo.com
412
00:14:58,809 --> 00:15:00,029
if you wanted to go,
413
00:15:01,049 --> 00:15:02,570
check it out if you haven't heard of
414
00:15:02,570 --> 00:15:03,309
it before,
415
00:15:03,929 --> 00:15:04,394
which
416
00:15:04,795 --> 00:15:07,035
I'm always surprised that there are people in
417
00:15:07,035 --> 00:15:08,955
the community that are not aware of that
418
00:15:08,955 --> 00:15:10,075
conference. Mhmm.
419
00:15:10,634 --> 00:15:12,955
And so I I always try and share
420
00:15:12,955 --> 00:15:14,715
it as much as I can. But the
421
00:15:14,715 --> 00:15:16,715
the podcast hall of fame, the twenty twenty
422
00:15:16,715 --> 00:15:18,315
six podcast hall of fame is gonna be
423
00:15:18,315 --> 00:15:18,815
there.
424
00:15:19,769 --> 00:15:20,269
Plus
425
00:15:20,809 --> 00:15:22,730
this new media show is going to be
426
00:15:22,730 --> 00:15:24,190
on stage again, Rob.
427
00:15:24,809 --> 00:15:26,009
So we're gonna do it,
428
00:15:26,409 --> 00:15:28,990
live in front of an audience down there.
429
00:15:29,209 --> 00:15:30,970
And then I'm also gonna do a hall
430
00:15:30,970 --> 00:15:33,049
of fame hall of fame panel down there
431
00:15:33,049 --> 00:15:33,789
too. So
432
00:15:34,134 --> 00:15:36,294
I'm gonna be involved in two sessions down
433
00:15:36,294 --> 00:15:37,815
there, one for the hall of fame and
434
00:15:37,815 --> 00:15:41,095
one for the media show. So I'm gonna
435
00:15:41,095 --> 00:15:43,894
be building out panels down there for that,
436
00:15:43,894 --> 00:15:46,375
and that's coming together right now. But the
437
00:15:46,375 --> 00:15:48,615
big thing that's coming down the path right
438
00:15:48,615 --> 00:15:49,434
now is,
439
00:15:50,509 --> 00:15:51,009
getting
440
00:15:51,389 --> 00:15:52,769
finalized the selection.
441
00:15:53,870 --> 00:15:55,790
What it's looking like is gonna be 12
442
00:15:55,790 --> 00:15:57,950
people that are gonna be inducted into the
443
00:15:57,950 --> 00:16:00,350
podcast hall of fame. It could be 11.
444
00:16:00,350 --> 00:16:02,910
So there's always a couple of stragglers that
445
00:16:02,910 --> 00:16:03,570
are still
446
00:16:04,934 --> 00:16:07,014
trying to decide if they're gonna be there
447
00:16:07,014 --> 00:16:09,034
in person or if they're
448
00:16:09,495 --> 00:16:12,154
even going to accept the award. And
449
00:16:12,615 --> 00:16:13,754
that may not be
450
00:16:14,294 --> 00:16:16,075
commonly known out there, but,
451
00:16:16,940 --> 00:16:18,700
as Rob, as you know, that there are
452
00:16:18,700 --> 00:16:21,500
people that have decided to not accept the
453
00:16:21,500 --> 00:16:22,639
hall of fame induction,
454
00:16:23,500 --> 00:16:25,740
which may come as a surprise to some
455
00:16:25,740 --> 00:16:26,639
people. But,
456
00:16:27,659 --> 00:16:29,659
I mean, I would think that everybody would
457
00:16:29,659 --> 00:16:32,205
want to be be inducted, but there's there's
458
00:16:32,205 --> 00:16:34,945
a bunch of reasons that I hear sometimes,
459
00:16:35,725 --> 00:16:37,105
of why that doesn't happen.
460
00:16:38,205 --> 00:16:39,045
But it's
461
00:16:39,485 --> 00:16:42,045
there can be all sorts of issues that
462
00:16:42,045 --> 00:16:43,565
can come up, but it it it it's
463
00:16:43,565 --> 00:16:45,725
also can be a personal choice type of
464
00:16:45,725 --> 00:16:48,669
situation too. We don't force people to get
465
00:16:48,669 --> 00:16:51,549
inducted into the whole thing. So, so it's
466
00:16:51,549 --> 00:16:53,710
a much more kind of cooperative thing because
467
00:16:53,710 --> 00:16:55,389
that's the environment that I want to create
468
00:16:55,389 --> 00:16:57,870
with the whole thing is that people that,
469
00:16:57,870 --> 00:17:00,450
you know, get inducted want to be there.
470
00:17:00,745 --> 00:17:02,985
And because it it really aligns with the
471
00:17:02,985 --> 00:17:04,904
values of the whole whole of fame and
472
00:17:04,904 --> 00:17:06,984
the purpose of it. And what we're trying
473
00:17:06,984 --> 00:17:09,005
to accomplish with it is we want people
474
00:17:09,464 --> 00:17:11,644
that are inducted into it that really,
475
00:17:12,664 --> 00:17:13,164
have
476
00:17:13,785 --> 00:17:16,319
a a kind of a persona of,
477
00:17:16,799 --> 00:17:19,700
of really giving back, right, to the podcasting
478
00:17:19,759 --> 00:17:21,299
space and building community
479
00:17:22,159 --> 00:17:24,259
and being being a good participant,
480
00:17:25,519 --> 00:17:28,000
in in the medium. And that's that that's
481
00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:29,039
why we do it that way. So I
482
00:17:29,039 --> 00:17:31,394
would say probably over half of the inductees
483
00:17:31,454 --> 00:17:34,174
are gonna be there in person. Mhmm. So
484
00:17:34,174 --> 00:17:36,275
that's that's always a terrific outcome.
485
00:17:36,654 --> 00:17:38,734
The first reaction from some people is is
486
00:17:38,734 --> 00:17:40,654
that, you know, well, I can't make it,
487
00:17:40,654 --> 00:17:42,815
but as they kinda move down the path
488
00:17:42,815 --> 00:17:44,095
and they think about it a little bit
489
00:17:44,095 --> 00:17:46,275
more, they oftentimes come back and say, well,
490
00:17:46,380 --> 00:17:47,279
I'll be there. Absolutely.
491
00:17:48,299 --> 00:17:50,539
So so it's always a good good kind
492
00:17:50,539 --> 00:17:52,720
of move that, that happens
493
00:17:53,339 --> 00:17:54,960
over time. So I wanted to show
494
00:17:55,660 --> 00:17:57,920
next the the hall of fame,
495
00:18:00,465 --> 00:18:02,785
website. So if you wanted to go check
496
00:18:02,785 --> 00:18:03,445
it out,
497
00:18:04,065 --> 00:18:06,305
I think I just disconnected it. So let
498
00:18:06,305 --> 00:18:07,605
me go in and
499
00:18:08,065 --> 00:18:09,285
reconnect it again.
500
00:18:10,545 --> 00:18:11,045
And
501
00:18:11,659 --> 00:18:14,220
so all the information about the hall of
502
00:18:14,220 --> 00:18:15,039
fame is
503
00:18:15,419 --> 00:18:16,720
is on this page,
504
00:18:17,099 --> 00:18:17,819
and it's at,
505
00:18:18,460 --> 00:18:20,079
podcasthall.com.
506
00:18:20,619 --> 00:18:22,240
If you wanted to go
507
00:18:22,700 --> 00:18:25,394
go check it out, it's got last year's
508
00:18:25,394 --> 00:18:27,475
full bulk of your phone. Is that because
509
00:18:27,475 --> 00:18:30,535
Todd registered podcasthalloffame.com?
510
00:18:32,275 --> 00:18:33,575
I believe he did
511
00:18:34,275 --> 00:18:34,775
when
512
00:18:35,075 --> 00:18:36,695
yeah. Right. I think he was
513
00:18:37,075 --> 00:18:38,355
He was always quick to,
514
00:18:39,210 --> 00:18:41,049
register if you had your domain names around
515
00:18:41,049 --> 00:18:43,210
town. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. He tends to wanna
516
00:18:43,210 --> 00:18:43,690
do that.
517
00:18:45,849 --> 00:18:47,789
But I I believe he did a redirect
518
00:18:47,849 --> 00:18:50,909
on this too. So I think he redirected
519
00:18:51,049 --> 00:18:53,404
the traffic to this one. So if you
520
00:18:53,404 --> 00:18:55,964
did type in podcasthalloffame.com,
521
00:18:55,964 --> 00:18:58,144
I think it does get redirected to this.
522
00:18:59,244 --> 00:19:01,025
So and I think yeah.
523
00:19:01,325 --> 00:19:03,805
There's actually three domain names, but but I
524
00:19:03,805 --> 00:19:05,884
tend to focus just on one. Podcast hall
525
00:19:05,884 --> 00:19:09,640
is short and sweet and it and it
526
00:19:09,640 --> 00:19:12,519
says it all to some degree, but having
527
00:19:12,519 --> 00:19:15,740
that podcast halloffame address is great too. But
528
00:19:16,839 --> 00:19:18,380
so what's on this page
529
00:19:18,759 --> 00:19:21,259
is a link to the ceremony.
530
00:19:21,984 --> 00:19:22,964
So if you wanted
531
00:19:23,825 --> 00:19:25,284
to come to Podfest
532
00:19:25,825 --> 00:19:26,325
and
533
00:19:27,105 --> 00:19:29,825
attend the ceremony in person, you can do
534
00:19:29,825 --> 00:19:32,784
do that. And there's in person tickets that
535
00:19:32,784 --> 00:19:33,444
are available,
536
00:19:34,589 --> 00:19:36,369
right here that you can click on.
537
00:19:37,390 --> 00:19:39,630
But but the event will be produced into
538
00:19:39,630 --> 00:19:40,849
a full video,
539
00:19:41,309 --> 00:19:43,470
so so you'll be able to watch it,
540
00:19:43,869 --> 00:19:45,630
I believe that's gonna come out on the
541
00:19:45,630 --> 00:19:48,355
eighteenth. So it'll be a couple days after
542
00:19:48,355 --> 00:19:48,855
the
543
00:19:49,394 --> 00:19:51,634
the in person's ceremony. Hopefully, we can get
544
00:19:51,634 --> 00:19:52,115
it out,
545
00:19:52,914 --> 00:19:53,974
in that time frame
546
00:19:54,355 --> 00:19:57,154
ready to go. And so so and then
547
00:19:57,154 --> 00:19:59,734
also what's there too is all of the
548
00:20:00,115 --> 00:20:00,934
past inductees.
549
00:20:01,859 --> 00:20:03,779
And, hopefully, here in the next day or
550
00:20:03,779 --> 00:20:05,160
so, we will have
551
00:20:05,619 --> 00:20:06,759
our our new inductees
552
00:20:07,140 --> 00:20:08,200
listed in here.
553
00:20:08,819 --> 00:20:09,799
And so
554
00:20:10,180 --> 00:20:11,400
last year's inductees
555
00:20:11,859 --> 00:20:14,579
are listed in here and all the prior
556
00:20:14,579 --> 00:20:15,480
years too.
557
00:20:16,304 --> 00:20:18,224
So if you wanted to go and and
558
00:20:18,224 --> 00:20:21,024
check out what the past has been for
559
00:20:21,024 --> 00:20:22,944
the hall of fame, it's it's all right
560
00:20:22,944 --> 00:20:24,704
there. And if you wanted to go and
561
00:20:24,704 --> 00:20:25,684
watch some
562
00:20:26,704 --> 00:20:27,284
some past
563
00:20:28,625 --> 00:20:30,005
videos of past
564
00:20:31,299 --> 00:20:33,779
ceremonies from the past. You can see Dave
565
00:20:33,779 --> 00:20:36,660
Jackson there. You know, his induction back in
566
00:20:36,660 --> 00:20:37,480
2018
567
00:20:38,099 --> 00:20:39,000
and the full
568
00:20:39,539 --> 00:20:40,440
2017
569
00:20:40,580 --> 00:20:41,080
induction,
570
00:20:41,859 --> 00:20:43,755
which at the time was part,
571
00:20:44,634 --> 00:20:45,275
part of,
572
00:20:45,674 --> 00:20:46,575
podcast movement.
573
00:20:47,835 --> 00:20:50,075
And that's when I got inducted was on
574
00:20:50,075 --> 00:20:50,234
the
575
00:20:50,875 --> 00:20:52,015
in 2017.
576
00:20:52,795 --> 00:20:54,795
What was different about the hall of fame
577
00:20:54,795 --> 00:20:56,795
back then is that it was combined with
578
00:20:56,795 --> 00:20:58,095
a podcast awards.
579
00:20:58,639 --> 00:21:00,899
So the hall of famers were sprinkled
580
00:21:01,440 --> 00:21:01,940
amongst,
581
00:21:04,319 --> 00:21:07,139
you know, podcast award winners. So
582
00:21:07,599 --> 00:21:09,200
which is different than the hall of fame
583
00:21:09,200 --> 00:21:10,259
today, which is
584
00:21:10,720 --> 00:21:11,940
just the hall of fame.
585
00:21:12,720 --> 00:21:13,220
So
586
00:21:13,644 --> 00:21:15,724
it's not it doesn't currently have,
587
00:21:16,204 --> 00:21:16,704
a
588
00:21:17,085 --> 00:21:19,724
awards, like a podcast awards kind of piece
589
00:21:19,724 --> 00:21:20,384
to it.
590
00:21:21,404 --> 00:21:23,404
So so anyway, and also I wanted to
591
00:21:23,404 --> 00:21:24,224
thank Podfest
592
00:21:24,525 --> 00:21:28,620
for for giving us a venue and and
593
00:21:28,680 --> 00:21:31,640
and really supporting the the event. And and
594
00:21:31,640 --> 00:21:34,200
the Bluberry platform has come through this year
595
00:21:34,200 --> 00:21:34,940
with a
596
00:21:35,400 --> 00:21:35,900
sponsorship
597
00:21:36,200 --> 00:21:38,140
of the Hall of Fame. And and hopefully
598
00:21:38,200 --> 00:21:38,759
we'll have,
599
00:21:39,585 --> 00:21:41,984
a a few more sponsors before the event
600
00:21:41,984 --> 00:21:42,484
happens.
601
00:21:43,424 --> 00:21:44,065
And then,
602
00:21:44,944 --> 00:21:46,964
Pod News is kind of our
603
00:21:47,424 --> 00:21:49,444
our our media partner. So
604
00:21:50,384 --> 00:21:51,524
so, anyway, let's,
605
00:21:52,144 --> 00:21:53,125
hop out of that
606
00:21:53,984 --> 00:21:54,484
and
607
00:21:56,339 --> 00:21:59,240
come back, and we can continue our conversation,
608
00:21:59,460 --> 00:21:59,960
Rob.
609
00:22:00,819 --> 00:22:01,319
So
610
00:22:02,019 --> 00:22:04,920
so anyway, let's let's go ahead and kinda
611
00:22:05,059 --> 00:22:06,200
move on from that.
612
00:22:06,500 --> 00:22:07,000
And,
613
00:22:08,180 --> 00:22:08,680
well,
614
00:22:09,220 --> 00:22:10,119
let me tease
615
00:22:10,795 --> 00:22:12,255
a few of the inductees.
616
00:22:12,875 --> 00:22:14,714
Actually, I've got it in the show notes
617
00:22:14,714 --> 00:22:16,954
here, so we might as well share that
618
00:22:16,954 --> 00:22:21,055
this has not been publicly released yet, but
619
00:22:21,115 --> 00:22:21,994
the names that I'm
620
00:22:22,759 --> 00:22:23,820
I have here,
621
00:22:24,840 --> 00:22:27,160
have already agreed to be inducted in the
622
00:22:27,160 --> 00:22:28,920
hall of fame. There's a couple of names
623
00:22:28,920 --> 00:22:29,660
that are
624
00:22:30,279 --> 00:22:31,740
potentially missing here,
625
00:22:32,360 --> 00:22:33,259
that haven't,
626
00:22:33,960 --> 00:22:35,019
officially confirmed.
627
00:22:35,945 --> 00:22:37,565
So I won't mention them.
628
00:22:38,184 --> 00:22:38,585
Okay.
629
00:22:39,224 --> 00:22:41,224
And the first one, and and I know,
630
00:22:41,224 --> 00:22:43,065
Rob, you're a big fan of, is Dan
631
00:22:43,065 --> 00:22:44,365
Carlin. Yes.
632
00:22:45,144 --> 00:22:46,285
Hardcore history.
633
00:22:47,704 --> 00:22:49,785
He's telling me there's a new episode coming
634
00:22:49,785 --> 00:22:51,329
out the end of this month. We'll see.
635
00:22:51,329 --> 00:22:51,730
We'll see if it makes
636
00:22:52,609 --> 00:22:54,769
It's funny. I think, well, we think we're
637
00:22:54,769 --> 00:22:56,609
gonna cut the episode down. It'll only be
638
00:22:56,609 --> 00:22:58,369
four hours long so we can Oh, is
639
00:22:58,369 --> 00:23:00,149
that all? Okay. Right.
640
00:23:00,529 --> 00:23:01,029
Right.
641
00:23:01,329 --> 00:23:03,329
Well, now he knows if he's a hall
642
00:23:03,329 --> 00:23:05,169
of famer, so maybe he'll mention that as
643
00:23:05,169 --> 00:23:08,714
part of his history. Oh, come on. So
644
00:23:09,414 --> 00:23:11,434
and then the next one is Paul Culligan,
645
00:23:13,095 --> 00:23:15,575
who's been around this medium. I met Paul
646
00:23:15,654 --> 00:23:19,894
We met him at at Gnome Decks, 2005
647
00:23:19,894 --> 00:23:21,914
or '6. It was one of the two.
648
00:23:21,930 --> 00:23:23,630
But, yes, we met him at Gnomedek.
649
00:23:24,250 --> 00:23:26,250
Yeah. At first met Paul back when I
650
00:23:26,250 --> 00:23:28,890
was working for Microsoft on the on the
651
00:23:28,890 --> 00:23:29,789
Zoom. So
652
00:23:30,090 --> 00:23:32,170
and then another one who comes out of
653
00:23:32,170 --> 00:23:34,970
the the video podcasting era, but has a
654
00:23:34,970 --> 00:23:35,470
strong
655
00:23:35,994 --> 00:23:36,494
connection
656
00:23:37,115 --> 00:23:37,615
with,
657
00:23:39,034 --> 00:23:40,654
like CNET radio and
658
00:23:41,115 --> 00:23:44,734
and other other kind of tech related,
659
00:23:45,355 --> 00:23:48,990
podcasting platforms is Veronica Belmont. And that may
660
00:23:49,289 --> 00:23:51,390
be a a new name to many people
661
00:23:51,450 --> 00:23:53,309
because she hasn't been really
662
00:23:53,690 --> 00:23:55,869
plugged into the podcast side of things
663
00:23:56,250 --> 00:23:58,409
or my community standpoint over the years, but
664
00:23:58,409 --> 00:24:00,650
I've known her for for many, many years
665
00:24:00,650 --> 00:24:02,809
now, and she had huge impact on the
666
00:24:02,809 --> 00:24:03,964
early years of hypnosis.
667
00:24:04,904 --> 00:24:08,204
Yep. And and we're also gonna do
668
00:24:08,585 --> 00:24:11,964
a a memorial induction of Dan Miller,
669
00:24:13,065 --> 00:24:13,565
who,
670
00:24:14,345 --> 00:24:16,605
we're gonna be lucky to have Dave Ramsey
671
00:24:16,904 --> 00:24:18,534
is going to induct
672
00:24:19,079 --> 00:24:21,819
Dan Miller on on stage in Orlando.
673
00:24:22,679 --> 00:24:23,179
So,
674
00:24:24,119 --> 00:24:25,980
and I know, Rob, I
675
00:24:26,440 --> 00:24:27,319
I you know,
676
00:24:27,880 --> 00:24:31,079
Dave well. I'm sure. Yep. And and and
677
00:24:31,079 --> 00:24:31,579
Dan.
678
00:24:32,044 --> 00:24:34,044
You know, Dan was down where I live
679
00:24:34,044 --> 00:24:35,804
now. He was in this area, the Franklin
680
00:24:35,804 --> 00:24:36,704
Brentwood area,
681
00:24:37,005 --> 00:24:39,724
and and he had a mastermind group and
682
00:24:39,724 --> 00:24:41,484
Dave was part of that group. And there's
683
00:24:41,484 --> 00:24:43,585
a lot of people came out of Dan's
684
00:24:43,644 --> 00:24:44,765
mastermind group.
685
00:24:46,079 --> 00:24:47,619
Definitely big influence.
686
00:24:48,559 --> 00:24:49,779
Yeah. I talked to,
687
00:24:50,640 --> 00:24:54,079
Dave Dave Ramsey today about about the induction,
688
00:24:54,079 --> 00:24:56,980
and he's he's he's willing to do anything.
689
00:24:57,119 --> 00:24:59,059
He was a very close friend,
690
00:25:00,725 --> 00:25:02,884
of of Dan's for, like, four years, I
691
00:25:02,884 --> 00:25:03,705
guess. So,
692
00:25:04,725 --> 00:25:06,005
he he's gotta be there,
693
00:25:07,125 --> 00:25:08,025
with an impassionate,
694
00:25:08,805 --> 00:25:09,305
presentation
695
00:25:09,684 --> 00:25:11,065
to to induct Dan.
696
00:25:11,445 --> 00:25:14,424
I have never seen a better public speaker
697
00:25:14,484 --> 00:25:15,705
than Dave Ramsey.
698
00:25:16,210 --> 00:25:18,450
Okay. Cool. He, He's great to talk on
699
00:25:18,450 --> 00:25:20,049
the phone with too. So Yeah. I mean,
700
00:25:20,049 --> 00:25:22,070
I've seen him speak a couple times live.
701
00:25:22,610 --> 00:25:25,910
Unbelievable speaker. Yeah. Yeah. Well, he's
702
00:25:26,289 --> 00:25:29,170
he's got a unbelievable network too that's been
703
00:25:29,170 --> 00:25:30,630
very successful. Right?
704
00:25:31,414 --> 00:25:33,335
And the next one that probably won't be
705
00:25:33,335 --> 00:25:35,815
too much of a big surprise to to
706
00:25:35,815 --> 00:25:37,674
to many people is James Cridland.
707
00:25:39,174 --> 00:25:41,194
So so, you know, I know.
708
00:25:43,095 --> 00:25:44,855
But he has had a huge impact on
709
00:25:44,855 --> 00:25:47,069
the podcasting space, and he got lots and
710
00:25:47,069 --> 00:25:48,049
lots of votes,
711
00:25:48,589 --> 00:25:51,089
in the the process. And all these
712
00:25:51,470 --> 00:25:52,990
people that I mentioned here,
713
00:25:53,390 --> 00:25:56,029
have have gone through a voting process. So
714
00:25:56,029 --> 00:25:57,169
we've had, like,
715
00:25:58,269 --> 00:25:59,250
50 plus,
716
00:26:00,029 --> 00:26:03,315
people that have voted to to select this
717
00:26:03,315 --> 00:26:06,294
from a group of probably close to 200,
718
00:26:06,674 --> 00:26:07,174
nominees.
719
00:26:10,115 --> 00:26:12,755
That list can grow, but that comes with
720
00:26:12,755 --> 00:26:16,934
some inherent challenges too. Mhmm. So, Lucas,
721
00:26:17,839 --> 00:26:19,759
I got some comments from some of the
722
00:26:19,759 --> 00:26:21,140
voters saying that the
723
00:26:21,440 --> 00:26:22,740
the list was too long
724
00:26:23,440 --> 00:26:25,279
to be able to It was. I I
725
00:26:25,359 --> 00:26:26,720
there was a quite a few names on
726
00:26:26,720 --> 00:26:27,920
there. I was like, who? I had to
727
00:26:27,920 --> 00:26:29,680
look up. Like, who is this? Because I'm
728
00:26:29,680 --> 00:26:31,700
the one that always know people's name.
729
00:26:32,160 --> 00:26:32,740
I didn't.
730
00:26:33,285 --> 00:26:34,725
You did a lot better job than when
731
00:26:34,725 --> 00:26:36,085
I was earning it. I'll just say that.
732
00:26:36,085 --> 00:26:36,985
Much more organized.
733
00:26:37,644 --> 00:26:40,085
I for like, I'd email people going, here's
734
00:26:40,085 --> 00:26:41,684
the list to choose from. Send me back
735
00:26:41,684 --> 00:26:42,505
a few names.
736
00:26:42,805 --> 00:26:44,904
Well, that worked as well. But,
737
00:26:45,765 --> 00:26:47,365
but, yeah, I tried to include
738
00:26:48,660 --> 00:26:50,259
tried to follow through with a promise that
739
00:26:50,259 --> 00:26:52,180
I made up on stage last year is
740
00:26:52,180 --> 00:26:54,519
to include some international folks
741
00:26:55,059 --> 00:26:55,880
in the
742
00:26:56,259 --> 00:26:56,920
the list
743
00:26:57,220 --> 00:26:57,880
of potential,
744
00:26:59,299 --> 00:26:59,799
inductees,
745
00:27:00,100 --> 00:27:02,100
and I did that. So it's not a
746
00:27:02,100 --> 00:27:04,325
huge percentage of the list, but I'm trying
747
00:27:04,325 --> 00:27:05,865
to phase into it solely,
748
00:27:06,805 --> 00:27:09,065
to get, you know, some folks,
749
00:27:09,605 --> 00:27:10,105
recognized.
750
00:27:11,765 --> 00:27:12,265
And
751
00:27:12,565 --> 00:27:13,525
one of them is,
752
00:27:14,164 --> 00:27:16,265
who's outside of The US is Mark Esquith.
753
00:27:16,630 --> 00:27:19,029
He's gonna be inducted this year. He's gonna
754
00:27:19,029 --> 00:27:20,730
be there in person, he told me today.
755
00:27:21,269 --> 00:27:24,230
So I'm excited for that. And another one
756
00:27:24,230 --> 00:27:26,390
that may be a surprise to many people
757
00:27:26,390 --> 00:27:28,470
that, don't go back to the early years
758
00:27:28,470 --> 00:27:29,849
of podcasting is
759
00:27:30,274 --> 00:27:31,174
Julie Samuels
760
00:27:31,794 --> 00:27:35,474
from the Electronic Frontier Foundation organization. And the
761
00:27:35,474 --> 00:27:36,774
whole Adam Corolla
762
00:27:37,154 --> 00:27:39,954
fighting the patent troll. Patent troll in the
763
00:27:39,954 --> 00:27:40,694
early years.
764
00:27:41,794 --> 00:27:44,039
She had a significant impact, and and a
765
00:27:44,039 --> 00:27:46,440
lot of people will realize this and hopefully
766
00:27:46,440 --> 00:27:47,880
she'll talk about it a lot at the
767
00:27:47,880 --> 00:27:48,700
hall of fame
768
00:27:49,160 --> 00:27:50,460
around that whole process,
769
00:27:51,320 --> 00:27:52,880
that the industry went through. And there was
770
00:27:52,880 --> 00:27:54,360
a lot of fear and there was a
771
00:27:54,360 --> 00:27:56,200
lot of concern. A lot of people were,
772
00:27:56,200 --> 00:27:58,534
is it time to bail on podcasting because
773
00:27:58,534 --> 00:28:01,115
of this patent holder that was trying to
774
00:28:01,414 --> 00:28:04,234
sue people? And they did sue a few
775
00:28:04,294 --> 00:28:05,034
big companies.
776
00:28:05,414 --> 00:28:05,914
And,
777
00:28:06,375 --> 00:28:08,534
and but in the end, they were able
778
00:28:08,534 --> 00:28:11,309
to to kind of put down Yeah.
779
00:28:12,250 --> 00:28:14,330
It was beaten down with no chance of
780
00:28:14,330 --> 00:28:16,890
coming back. So it was EFF did a
781
00:28:16,890 --> 00:28:18,809
great job on that. I I worked with
782
00:28:18,809 --> 00:28:21,230
them when they were going through that AdRoll
783
00:28:21,369 --> 00:28:21,869
issue.
784
00:28:22,914 --> 00:28:24,035
We were we were part of that. We
785
00:28:24,035 --> 00:28:25,954
were hosting Adam Carle at the time. And
786
00:28:25,954 --> 00:28:27,875
then I I remember being on calls with
787
00:28:27,875 --> 00:28:29,875
Julie and and the EFS and,
788
00:28:30,434 --> 00:28:31,634
Apple. Yeah.
789
00:28:32,194 --> 00:28:34,994
I can't be any happier for the EFS.
790
00:28:34,994 --> 00:28:36,934
I joined an EFS member
791
00:28:37,394 --> 00:28:38,720
back then and still
792
00:28:39,099 --> 00:28:41,259
am. Lots of people did back then. Yeah.
793
00:28:41,259 --> 00:28:43,759
And lots of people stepped up and donated
794
00:28:44,059 --> 00:28:47,099
Mhmm. To the legal defense fund. I know
795
00:28:47,099 --> 00:28:48,619
I did too. I know a bunch of
796
00:28:48,619 --> 00:28:49,419
people did,
797
00:28:50,220 --> 00:28:51,615
to try and fight back
798
00:28:52,255 --> 00:28:54,335
against this troll that was trying to take
799
00:28:54,335 --> 00:28:55,234
down podcasting.
800
00:28:55,535 --> 00:28:57,214
And it was really a patent that wasn't
801
00:28:57,214 --> 00:28:59,855
really grounded in what podcasting was anyway, so
802
00:28:59,855 --> 00:29:01,934
it was really kind of a silly, silly
803
00:29:01,934 --> 00:29:03,855
thing that they were trying to do. So
804
00:29:03,855 --> 00:29:05,474
the next one is Kerry Hoffman,
805
00:29:05,789 --> 00:29:08,210
who is a long time CEO of BRX,
806
00:29:08,670 --> 00:29:10,289
has been a been a big
807
00:29:10,590 --> 00:29:13,330
impact on the podcast medium for many years.
808
00:29:14,190 --> 00:29:16,830
So I'm excited to have her inducted as
809
00:29:16,830 --> 00:29:17,809
well. And
810
00:29:18,184 --> 00:29:19,404
Ariel Nissenblatt,
811
00:29:19,865 --> 00:29:21,384
is is our one.
812
00:29:22,025 --> 00:29:23,244
She's a more
813
00:29:23,545 --> 00:29:25,865
recent podcaster, but but,
814
00:29:26,345 --> 00:29:28,345
is more out of the modern era of
815
00:29:28,345 --> 00:29:31,065
podcasting, which I was excited to to see.
816
00:29:31,065 --> 00:29:33,559
And I I would say that she's probably
817
00:29:34,099 --> 00:29:36,839
one of, or if not the best candidate
818
00:29:36,980 --> 00:29:39,779
for this induction at this age for her.
819
00:29:39,779 --> 00:29:41,779
So so I think it's terrific. And then
820
00:29:41,779 --> 00:29:43,700
the the last one I can announce here
821
00:29:43,700 --> 00:29:46,259
at this point is, Sarah VanMozel. You know,
822
00:29:46,259 --> 00:29:47,720
you and I both know about
823
00:29:48,345 --> 00:29:51,384
Sarah's impact, which has been wide ranging and
824
00:29:51,384 --> 00:29:53,304
massive. I don't know if you wanna share
825
00:29:53,304 --> 00:29:55,304
share a little bit about her. No. She's
826
00:29:55,304 --> 00:29:57,384
been key player in the space. I'm very
827
00:29:57,384 --> 00:29:59,384
happy for her, and and I was glad
828
00:29:59,384 --> 00:30:00,825
to see her name listed as one of
829
00:30:00,825 --> 00:30:01,625
the ones I got,
830
00:30:02,184 --> 00:30:04,740
in this group. So there are hopefully, Sarah
831
00:30:04,740 --> 00:30:06,500
will be one that shows up. Say hi.
832
00:30:06,820 --> 00:30:08,340
But, yeah, I don't know how many of
833
00:30:08,340 --> 00:30:10,019
these have said they're gonna show versus how
834
00:30:10,019 --> 00:30:11,640
many said they're gonna send in videos.
835
00:30:11,940 --> 00:30:13,700
Like I said, a little bit less than
836
00:30:13,700 --> 00:30:16,600
half are going to, but I'm not gonna
837
00:30:16,660 --> 00:30:18,974
say because they may change their mind, which
838
00:30:18,974 --> 00:30:21,054
I've already seen happen today. So I'm I'm
839
00:30:21,054 --> 00:30:22,974
happy to see that. So but it should
840
00:30:22,974 --> 00:30:24,575
be great. And if you can make it
841
00:30:24,575 --> 00:30:25,234
to podfest
842
00:30:25,775 --> 00:30:27,075
expo dot com,
843
00:30:27,855 --> 00:30:30,575
it starts on the January 15. I know
844
00:30:30,575 --> 00:30:33,299
it's coming up, pretty quickly, but it's a
845
00:30:33,299 --> 00:30:36,420
significant event from a creator perspective. And I
846
00:30:36,420 --> 00:30:38,579
think that's the thing to think about it.
847
00:30:38,579 --> 00:30:40,579
As we've seen what what was happened with
848
00:30:40,579 --> 00:30:42,579
podcast movement and things like that, I think
849
00:30:42,579 --> 00:30:45,394
it's it's kind of a a good alternative,
850
00:30:46,654 --> 00:30:49,215
conference if you wanna wanna support a conference.
851
00:30:49,215 --> 00:30:52,255
I'm not against podcast movement, and those guys
852
00:30:52,255 --> 00:30:54,734
are doing terrific stuff over there as well.
853
00:30:54,734 --> 00:30:57,234
But to have an outlet for indie podcasters,
854
00:30:58,059 --> 00:30:59,519
that's really the events,
855
00:31:00,220 --> 00:31:02,220
right now. But I think over time, it's
856
00:31:02,220 --> 00:31:04,619
gonna become a little bit more professionalized too
857
00:31:04,619 --> 00:31:06,640
just because of the evolution of the industry.
858
00:31:07,099 --> 00:31:09,599
I get I hope everyone that was inducted
859
00:31:09,820 --> 00:31:12,380
has the ability, again, timing wise. Maybe not
860
00:31:12,380 --> 00:31:15,134
everybody can. But hopefully, from their schedule, it
861
00:31:15,134 --> 00:31:17,454
allows them to come down. And being inducted
862
00:31:17,454 --> 00:31:18,974
in person, you know, having not through it,
863
00:31:18,974 --> 00:31:21,394
it it's something they'll remember forever. And,
864
00:31:22,095 --> 00:31:23,615
I, you know, I feel sorry for those
865
00:31:23,615 --> 00:31:25,054
that that just sent in the video. I
866
00:31:25,054 --> 00:31:27,509
think they miss out on on part of
867
00:31:27,509 --> 00:31:29,670
the the feel of it then. And it's
868
00:31:29,670 --> 00:31:31,269
great to see the people that show up
869
00:31:31,269 --> 00:31:33,109
there and are there to support you,
870
00:31:33,830 --> 00:31:36,309
when you get inducted. So, and I hope
871
00:31:36,309 --> 00:31:37,830
I hope everyone's able to make it. I
872
00:31:37,830 --> 00:31:40,150
understand, you know, some people are have to
873
00:31:40,150 --> 00:31:42,009
travel halfway around the world literally,
874
00:31:42,625 --> 00:31:43,444
to make it.
875
00:31:44,785 --> 00:31:46,625
Well, like, Mark Asquith is a good example
876
00:31:46,625 --> 00:31:49,105
of that. I was I was nervous about
877
00:31:49,105 --> 00:31:51,365
inducting people outside of The US because,
878
00:31:51,904 --> 00:31:54,224
just the travel aspect of it, right, to
879
00:31:54,224 --> 00:31:55,285
be there in person.
880
00:31:55,690 --> 00:31:57,369
But I I was happy to hear that,
881
00:31:57,690 --> 00:31:59,289
he's gonna do everything he can to be
882
00:31:59,289 --> 00:32:01,850
there. So Yeah. So global global, give him
883
00:32:01,850 --> 00:32:03,130
the give him the tickets, get him out
884
00:32:03,130 --> 00:32:05,289
there. Uh-huh. It's gonna fit out right. Well,
885
00:32:05,289 --> 00:32:07,529
I think that's gonna happen. So so that
886
00:32:07,609 --> 00:32:10,055
that'd be fantastic. So, yes, I wanted to
887
00:32:10,055 --> 00:32:12,994
say big thank you to, to Blueberry Podcasting
888
00:32:13,454 --> 00:32:16,414
and the Hall of Fame for, for being
889
00:32:16,414 --> 00:32:19,154
a supporter of the show and, and also,
890
00:32:19,535 --> 00:32:21,154
being just a terrific
891
00:32:21,539 --> 00:32:24,420
company that that supported, you know, podcast that
892
00:32:24,420 --> 00:32:27,220
supports this show, and I just appreciate it.
893
00:32:27,220 --> 00:32:27,539
Let's,
894
00:32:28,180 --> 00:32:31,320
jump in and talk about YouTube and Spotify
895
00:32:31,539 --> 00:32:34,180
and what they're doing in podcasting. The there
896
00:32:34,180 --> 00:32:35,720
are some trend reports
897
00:32:36,034 --> 00:32:38,835
that are out there, top podcast lists. So
898
00:32:38,835 --> 00:32:40,194
I wanted to pull those up on the
899
00:32:40,194 --> 00:32:42,355
screen. And so we we can all kinda
900
00:32:42,355 --> 00:32:44,054
take a look at this and see
901
00:32:44,355 --> 00:32:47,634
what's actually going on here with this. And
902
00:32:47,875 --> 00:32:50,319
I'll get everyone a hint. There's, like, three
903
00:32:50,319 --> 00:32:53,859
top twenty twenty five lists when Apple, Spotify,
904
00:32:54,240 --> 00:32:56,240
YouTube. Guess who's at the top of every
905
00:32:56,240 --> 00:32:58,640
one of those three? Yeah. I know. It's
906
00:32:58,640 --> 00:33:02,179
actually not very surprising. So this is the
907
00:33:02,319 --> 00:33:05,505
the top list in The US from YouTube.
908
00:33:05,565 --> 00:33:07,664
This is based on watch time.
909
00:33:07,965 --> 00:33:10,765
So it's not a subscription list or how
910
00:33:10,765 --> 00:33:13,724
many viewers. This is based on how much
911
00:33:13,724 --> 00:33:16,845
time people spend with a particular show that
912
00:33:16,845 --> 00:33:19,589
they classify as a podcast. And that's better.
913
00:33:19,589 --> 00:33:21,750
Right. Isn't that the best metric though when
914
00:33:21,750 --> 00:33:23,430
you really think about it? Yeah. It is.
915
00:33:23,430 --> 00:33:25,029
Yeah. I mean, okay. So you have a
916
00:33:25,029 --> 00:33:27,269
million people watch a five minute episode, but
917
00:33:27,269 --> 00:33:29,269
if you have 750,000
918
00:33:29,269 --> 00:33:31,130
people watch a two hour episode,
919
00:33:31,465 --> 00:33:32,924
which one is more influential?
920
00:33:33,384 --> 00:33:34,505
I I would go with the one that's
921
00:33:34,505 --> 00:33:37,225
the two hour tour. Right. And and Joe
922
00:33:37,225 --> 00:33:40,025
Rogan comes out number one, right, as is
923
00:33:40,025 --> 00:33:42,184
the show that gets the most watch time.
924
00:33:42,184 --> 00:33:44,569
Probably helps that it's all of his episodes
925
00:33:44,630 --> 00:33:46,549
are at least two hours long, but I
926
00:33:46,549 --> 00:33:48,549
wrestle with that, though. I don't know that
927
00:33:48,549 --> 00:33:50,630
any and every show can pull that off,
928
00:33:50,630 --> 00:33:52,650
though. I don't know what you think, Ralph.
929
00:33:52,869 --> 00:33:54,869
I mean, no. Not a book can pull
930
00:33:54,869 --> 00:33:56,654
that off. I mean, some of these folks
931
00:33:56,654 --> 00:33:58,414
do have, you know, Vaughn's episodes of Long
932
00:33:58,414 --> 00:34:01,615
John Ryan's are longer. Rotten Mangos, they're more
933
00:34:01,615 --> 00:34:02,115
produced,
934
00:34:02,494 --> 00:34:05,055
so but Kill Tony's are longer. Not as
935
00:34:05,055 --> 00:34:07,234
long. When I'm looking through this list,
936
00:34:07,535 --> 00:34:09,775
yeah. But all I would say almost all
937
00:34:09,775 --> 00:34:11,699
of these are longer form content, you know,
938
00:34:11,699 --> 00:34:13,460
greater than thirty minutes. I think any of
939
00:34:13,460 --> 00:34:16,099
these are shorter than don't know the length.
940
00:34:16,099 --> 00:34:17,619
I've never listened to the diary of a
941
00:34:17,619 --> 00:34:18,119
CEO.
942
00:34:18,500 --> 00:34:20,420
But I think Yeah. That's them are pretty
943
00:34:20,420 --> 00:34:22,820
long too. I mean, he I think, Steven
944
00:34:22,820 --> 00:34:26,105
Bartlett goes close to two hours sometimes. He's
945
00:34:26,105 --> 00:34:28,744
actually trying to overtake Joe Rogan. In The
946
00:34:28,744 --> 00:34:30,905
UK, he's number two. Right? I think in
947
00:34:30,905 --> 00:34:32,905
The UK, he was either he was number
948
00:34:32,905 --> 00:34:34,505
two right behind Rogan. This here, you have
949
00:34:34,505 --> 00:34:36,184
The US list. He's actually doing really well
950
00:34:36,184 --> 00:34:38,099
if you think about that. Number two
951
00:34:38,480 --> 00:34:40,320
behind Joe Rogan, and I don't really even
952
00:34:40,320 --> 00:34:43,519
know if Kill Tony is actually an audio
953
00:34:43,519 --> 00:34:46,079
podcast too. I don't know for sure. I
954
00:34:46,079 --> 00:34:48,239
believe they do have the audio version available.
955
00:34:48,239 --> 00:34:49,059
Do they? Okay.
956
00:34:50,159 --> 00:34:51,139
They used to.
957
00:34:51,440 --> 00:34:54,505
Let's see. They still do. Oh, okay. That's
958
00:34:54,505 --> 00:34:56,585
a little bit clearer of a of a
959
00:34:56,585 --> 00:34:59,144
clean definition of what a what a podcast
960
00:34:59,144 --> 00:35:00,585
is. It just so happens that they have
961
00:35:00,585 --> 00:35:02,025
a video or Yes. They I mean, they
962
00:35:02,025 --> 00:35:04,025
do because they have a megaphone feed. So,
963
00:35:04,265 --> 00:35:06,105
that that that would have been an Apple
964
00:35:06,105 --> 00:35:08,659
podcast only as audio. So yes.
965
00:35:09,039 --> 00:35:11,920
Number three is Good Mythical Morning. It's the
966
00:35:11,920 --> 00:35:13,679
one just after that. I don't know if
967
00:35:13,679 --> 00:35:15,280
they have an RSS feed, but it would
968
00:35:15,280 --> 00:35:17,119
be interesting to see. I would think most
969
00:35:17,119 --> 00:35:19,760
of these do. They're good. Mythical Morning. Yes.
970
00:35:19,760 --> 00:35:21,920
So it was yeah. That one does not
971
00:35:21,920 --> 00:35:24,545
have an RSS feed. Oh, it does not.
972
00:35:24,545 --> 00:35:27,025
Okay. That's interesting. Okay. Well, not I'm not
973
00:35:27,025 --> 00:35:29,025
seeing it in Apple Podcast. So I technically
974
00:35:29,025 --> 00:35:31,125
would say that's not a podcast. It's probably
975
00:35:31,344 --> 00:35:33,204
listed in the podcast playlist,
976
00:35:33,744 --> 00:35:35,610
on They must have. Yeah. So it gets
977
00:35:35,610 --> 00:35:37,450
put in a list. Right? There are many
978
00:35:37,450 --> 00:35:39,130
people that I talk with that will tell
979
00:35:39,130 --> 00:35:41,369
you they're a podcaster and then are not
980
00:35:41,369 --> 00:35:42,349
an Apple Podcasts,
981
00:35:42,809 --> 00:35:45,450
only do video, and just happen to do
982
00:35:45,450 --> 00:35:47,130
and do shows that are more than thirty
983
00:35:47,130 --> 00:35:49,425
minutes on YouTube. People at this point now
984
00:35:49,425 --> 00:35:51,105
think if you do a weekly show, longer
985
00:35:51,105 --> 00:35:52,585
than thirty minutes and you're on YouTube, that's
986
00:35:52,585 --> 00:35:54,625
a podcast. I would disagree. I would say
987
00:35:54,625 --> 00:35:56,864
you you really need for that show to
988
00:35:56,864 --> 00:35:59,585
have, the audio version of it available and
989
00:35:59,585 --> 00:36:00,724
and be in a podcast
990
00:36:01,025 --> 00:36:03,329
and overcast and podcast and podcast and other
991
00:36:03,410 --> 00:36:05,170
places. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I think that
992
00:36:05,170 --> 00:36:07,170
that's a fair way to think about it.
993
00:36:07,170 --> 00:36:09,090
I mean, if it's only video and it's
994
00:36:09,090 --> 00:36:12,050
only on YouTube, it's kind of a hard
995
00:36:12,050 --> 00:36:14,050
case to make that it's really a short
996
00:36:14,050 --> 00:36:14,550
podcast.
997
00:36:14,930 --> 00:36:16,805
I think that's the other thing that's going
998
00:36:16,805 --> 00:36:19,285
on in in the industry right now is
999
00:36:19,285 --> 00:36:22,405
this kind of like this confusion about, what
1000
00:36:22,405 --> 00:36:25,385
a podcast is, and it's caused confusion amongst
1001
00:36:25,445 --> 00:36:27,364
people as they as they look at the
1002
00:36:27,364 --> 00:36:29,285
the medium. I would love to see every
1003
00:36:29,285 --> 00:36:31,180
one of these shows in the top 10
1004
00:36:31,280 --> 00:36:34,119
at YouTube top podcasts have an RSS feed
1005
00:36:34,119 --> 00:36:36,280
version of their show. I would think over
1006
00:36:36,280 --> 00:36:38,200
time, they probably will. I think it kind
1007
00:36:38,200 --> 00:36:39,800
of depends on the format of the show
1008
00:36:39,800 --> 00:36:42,519
too. If they because there there are video
1009
00:36:42,519 --> 00:36:44,380
first creators out there, but increasingly,
1010
00:36:44,825 --> 00:36:47,224
even though you're a video first creator, doesn't
1011
00:36:47,224 --> 00:36:49,545
mean that you can't have a audio podcast
1012
00:36:49,545 --> 00:36:51,144
version. Right. And if you would and there
1013
00:36:51,144 --> 00:36:52,825
are quite a few that have made that
1014
00:36:52,825 --> 00:36:55,065
transition. They started video and now have a
1015
00:36:55,065 --> 00:36:57,065
audio podcast starting to do well.
1016
00:36:57,945 --> 00:36:58,559
Bryce Crawford
1017
00:36:59,119 --> 00:37:01,440
started just video and now also has the
1018
00:37:01,440 --> 00:37:03,860
audio. Really, really popular podcast.
1019
00:37:04,160 --> 00:37:07,199
He hugely popular between males between the ages
1020
00:37:07,199 --> 00:37:10,000
of 14, 15, and and 25 that are
1021
00:37:10,000 --> 00:37:12,255
in the faith community. And and so anybody
1022
00:37:12,255 --> 00:37:14,014
that is in a youth church group is
1023
00:37:14,014 --> 00:37:15,934
a male will know who Bryce Crawford is,
1024
00:37:16,175 --> 00:37:18,255
and he started Just Video, now has also
1025
00:37:18,255 --> 00:37:20,094
audio. Oh, got it. And then,
1026
00:37:20,494 --> 00:37:23,454
number four is, Rotten Mango. I've never heard
1027
00:37:23,454 --> 00:37:25,454
of that one as a audio podcast. Oh,
1028
00:37:25,454 --> 00:37:25,954
yeah.
1029
00:37:26,269 --> 00:37:28,510
She's yeah. She's got audio. Oh, she does?
1030
00:37:28,510 --> 00:37:29,949
Okay. So if you look at this whole
1031
00:37:29,949 --> 00:37:30,929
list, Medeus
1032
00:37:31,389 --> 00:37:32,369
Touch podcast,
1033
00:37:32,989 --> 00:37:34,050
forty eight hours,
1034
00:37:34,510 --> 00:37:36,109
I don't know if forty eight hours has
1035
00:37:36,109 --> 00:37:38,109
an audio version. What do you think? I'm
1036
00:37:38,109 --> 00:37:40,304
looking that one up. Let's see. I thought
1037
00:37:40,304 --> 00:37:42,465
they did. It might just be yeah. They
1038
00:37:42,465 --> 00:37:43,984
do. They do have an audio version of
1039
00:37:43,984 --> 00:37:46,224
the show. Okay. And then the the Sean
1040
00:37:46,224 --> 00:37:48,224
Ryan show By the way, it is video
1041
00:37:48,224 --> 00:37:50,065
first, but the audio And then the Sean
1042
00:37:50,065 --> 00:37:52,989
Ryan show, which is has a audio version
1043
00:37:52,989 --> 00:37:55,230
as well. Right. Mhmm. It started as audio.
1044
00:37:55,230 --> 00:37:56,349
Yeah. And then Smosh
1045
00:37:56,670 --> 00:37:58,829
As an audio version. Yep. And Yep. The
1046
00:37:58,829 --> 00:38:01,630
Yovan, obviously, definitely an audio version. And so
1047
00:38:01,630 --> 00:38:03,630
does the diary of a CEO. So yeah.
1048
00:38:03,630 --> 00:38:05,309
The real It looks like it's just been
1049
00:38:05,309 --> 00:38:07,324
mythical morning is is the one that I
1050
00:38:07,324 --> 00:38:09,804
would say, if you're gonna be technical, isn't
1051
00:38:09,804 --> 00:38:12,364
truly Right. You're not in the podcast. Yeah.
1052
00:38:12,364 --> 00:38:14,284
You know? Oh, yeah. That's my definition. If
1053
00:38:14,284 --> 00:38:15,644
you're not in Apple Podcast Oh, yeah. Yeah.
1054
00:38:15,644 --> 00:38:16,784
Yeah. If you're not in Apple
1055
00:38:17,085 --> 00:38:19,244
Podcasts, then you're not in all the other
1056
00:38:19,244 --> 00:38:21,389
apps that pull from Apple's public directory. You're
1057
00:38:21,389 --> 00:38:23,889
not in PocketCasts. You're not in PocketCasts and
1058
00:38:24,109 --> 00:38:25,549
and all the others. So it's it's not
1059
00:38:25,549 --> 00:38:27,150
just about being an Apple, it's about being
1060
00:38:27,150 --> 00:38:29,069
an Apple's directory that all the other apps
1061
00:38:29,069 --> 00:38:31,089
pull from. And you can be just video
1062
00:38:31,150 --> 00:38:32,670
in there. Maybe that, you know, you don't
1063
00:38:32,670 --> 00:38:34,349
wanna have an audio version of your show.
1064
00:38:34,349 --> 00:38:36,195
You oh, it doesn't it doesn't not good
1065
00:38:36,195 --> 00:38:36,855
to have
1066
00:38:37,235 --> 00:38:38,835
an audio version of this. It doesn't work.
1067
00:38:38,835 --> 00:38:40,454
You're an artiste. Right? And
1068
00:38:40,994 --> 00:38:42,994
it it has to be video only. We
1069
00:38:42,994 --> 00:38:44,355
can still be an Apple podcast.
1070
00:38:44,835 --> 00:38:47,155
And then the audio will play just in
1071
00:38:47,155 --> 00:38:49,315
Overcast, but it'll still be an Overcast. That's
1072
00:38:49,315 --> 00:38:51,380
what this show does is it has a
1073
00:38:51,440 --> 00:38:54,799
a video RSS feed, that's available. That's something
1074
00:38:54,799 --> 00:38:56,159
that Todd and I have been with this
1075
00:38:56,159 --> 00:38:58,579
show for a very long time and continue
1076
00:38:58,639 --> 00:39:00,799
today. So it is possible to play video
1077
00:39:00,799 --> 00:39:03,219
in Apple Podcasts and a couple other platforms
1078
00:39:03,279 --> 00:39:04,994
too, as far as apps, and things like
1079
00:39:04,994 --> 00:39:06,994
that. It's not a very commonly known thing
1080
00:39:06,994 --> 00:39:09,154
anymore, is it, Rob? But Again, it's still
1081
00:39:09,315 --> 00:39:10,835
and I always say this. There's still more
1082
00:39:10,835 --> 00:39:12,514
time in the day to consume audio than
1083
00:39:12,514 --> 00:39:14,994
there is video. It's cheaper for people around
1084
00:39:14,994 --> 00:39:17,474
the world to stream audio than there is
1085
00:39:17,474 --> 00:39:20,034
video. You know, not everybody has cheap Internet
1086
00:39:20,034 --> 00:39:21,929
access. Yeah, that's true. That's true because it
1087
00:39:21,929 --> 00:39:23,449
takes up a lot of storage and and
1088
00:39:23,449 --> 00:39:26,010
it's usually higher playback bit rate. But if
1089
00:39:26,010 --> 00:39:28,510
you're if you're streaming that video, which oftentimes,
1090
00:39:28,650 --> 00:39:30,250
you know, if you look at these these
1091
00:39:30,250 --> 00:39:32,409
big platforms like the E2 or Spotify or
1092
00:39:32,409 --> 00:39:34,429
whatever, they're playing it via HLS
1093
00:39:34,734 --> 00:39:36,574
streams which can be like a variable bit
1094
00:39:36,574 --> 00:39:39,454
rate playback. So so it can adjust to
1095
00:39:39,454 --> 00:39:40,755
your bandwidth capabilities.
1096
00:39:41,214 --> 00:39:42,974
Up on the screen now, we have the
1097
00:39:42,974 --> 00:39:45,454
Spotify list for the top podcast globally in
1098
00:39:45,454 --> 00:39:46,675
2025.
1099
00:39:46,734 --> 00:39:49,054
This ranks Joe Rogan again number one. Big
1100
00:39:49,054 --> 00:39:51,880
surprise, Oh, man. Yeah. And number two, the
1101
00:39:51,880 --> 00:39:54,840
Diariam CEO, Steven Bartlett. So he's he's in
1102
00:39:54,840 --> 00:39:57,239
both lists. Yep. And Oh, yeah. And Mel
1103
00:39:57,239 --> 00:39:57,739
Robbins,
1104
00:39:58,519 --> 00:40:01,180
is number three. And Caller Daddy, number four.
1105
00:40:01,239 --> 00:40:03,775
Theo Vaughn. Back also on both lists. Right.
1106
00:40:03,775 --> 00:40:06,434
Interesting that the Huberman Lab podcast,
1107
00:40:07,375 --> 00:40:07,855
is,
1108
00:40:08,255 --> 00:40:10,094
didn't show up in the YouTube list. I
1109
00:40:10,094 --> 00:40:12,494
thought that that show was a a video
1110
00:40:12,494 --> 00:40:15,054
first program. No. It started as audio. Oh,
1111
00:40:15,054 --> 00:40:16,800
it started as audio, but I think he's
1112
00:40:16,960 --> 00:40:18,400
really put in a lot of effort into
1113
00:40:18,400 --> 00:40:20,079
the video side. Yeah. When he started with
1114
00:40:20,079 --> 00:40:22,480
us, it was audio only in Oh, okay.
1115
00:40:22,480 --> 00:40:23,920
So Or I mean, he made a pad
1116
00:40:23,920 --> 00:40:25,920
video. It was yeah. It was a big
1117
00:40:25,920 --> 00:40:28,160
part of the show was audio early. Okay.
1118
00:40:28,160 --> 00:40:29,519
So he is an example of a show
1119
00:40:29,519 --> 00:40:31,505
that that started out, built a big audience
1120
00:40:31,505 --> 00:40:33,184
on the audio side, and then just add
1121
00:40:33,184 --> 00:40:34,704
video. Okay. And then,
1122
00:40:35,184 --> 00:40:38,305
Crime Junkie, which is obviously a a big
1123
00:40:38,305 --> 00:40:40,545
audio show. Yeah. It's only audio. Right. That
1124
00:40:40,545 --> 00:40:43,184
would be a expensive production, I would imagine,
1125
00:40:43,184 --> 00:40:45,349
on the video side. Kinda like with Dan
1126
00:40:45,349 --> 00:40:46,730
Carlin as a good example.
1127
00:40:47,190 --> 00:40:49,110
Can you imagine if he made a video
1128
00:40:49,110 --> 00:40:51,750
version of his show, Ron? Yeah. He he
1129
00:40:51,750 --> 00:40:53,510
couldn't do it the way he did. You
1130
00:40:53,510 --> 00:40:55,110
know, some shows just will never
1131
00:40:55,590 --> 00:40:58,809
most true crime podcasts won't do video.
1132
00:40:59,264 --> 00:41:01,984
There's again, Rotten Mango is one that is,
1133
00:41:01,984 --> 00:41:04,545
but most the way they record and they
1134
00:41:04,545 --> 00:41:06,545
prep and they do it in sections and
1135
00:41:06,545 --> 00:41:08,784
segments and they build through it, it it's
1136
00:41:08,784 --> 00:41:10,385
hard it'd be hard for them to do
1137
00:41:10,385 --> 00:41:12,819
video and have it be of value. Right?
1138
00:41:12,819 --> 00:41:14,900
You know, sometimes you can do video. Anybody
1139
00:41:14,900 --> 00:41:16,339
could do video. Let me say this. Anybody
1140
00:41:16,339 --> 00:41:18,579
can do video. What at what cost to
1141
00:41:18,579 --> 00:41:21,299
the audio? Yeah. Well, also in what cost
1142
00:41:21,299 --> 00:41:22,119
to the creator's,
1143
00:41:22,500 --> 00:41:25,299
pocketbook? And is there a a a return
1144
00:41:25,299 --> 00:41:27,074
on that? That's the that's the other thing
1145
00:41:27,074 --> 00:41:28,835
that all these creators have to think about
1146
00:41:28,835 --> 00:41:30,835
is they can spend a lot to produce
1147
00:41:30,835 --> 00:41:32,195
video. And I'm seeing a lot of people
1148
00:41:32,195 --> 00:41:34,695
do that on YouTube now. I'm seeing full
1149
00:41:34,914 --> 00:41:36,295
movies and documentaries
1150
00:41:36,594 --> 00:41:38,855
being put together by independent creators,
1151
00:41:39,389 --> 00:41:41,150
that are, you know, at the level of,
1152
00:41:41,150 --> 00:41:42,750
you know, what you would have seen on
1153
00:41:42,750 --> 00:41:45,309
the Discovery Channel or someplace like that. So
1154
00:41:45,309 --> 00:41:47,549
there are people that are investing in creating
1155
00:41:47,549 --> 00:41:50,510
a video experience that, is on par with
1156
00:41:50,510 --> 00:41:52,304
what you would expect from a, you know,
1157
00:41:52,545 --> 00:41:54,224
like a history series or something like that
1158
00:41:54,224 --> 00:41:55,984
that maybe you saw on the History Channel
1159
00:41:55,984 --> 00:41:58,224
or something like that. I see people investing
1160
00:41:58,224 --> 00:42:00,385
a lot of energy in creating content like
1161
00:42:00,385 --> 00:42:02,304
that. I've been pretty impressed by it. Now,
1162
00:42:02,304 --> 00:42:04,769
how many of those are audio versions is
1163
00:42:04,849 --> 00:42:07,269
the other question. Right? They're probably not podcast.
1164
00:42:07,329 --> 00:42:08,530
And, you know, and and you look at
1165
00:42:08,530 --> 00:42:10,289
Apple's top list on some of these too.
1166
00:42:10,289 --> 00:42:12,849
Like, Huberman Labs made the top 10 in
1167
00:42:12,849 --> 00:42:14,929
Apple's list for the year. Prime Junkie made
1168
00:42:14,929 --> 00:42:16,929
the top 10. No audio. That I have
1169
00:42:16,929 --> 00:42:19,974
Apple's here in my document here. But, and
1170
00:42:19,974 --> 00:42:21,594
then the last couple here,
1171
00:42:21,894 --> 00:42:25,255
Modern Wisdom, that is a strong video program
1172
00:42:25,255 --> 00:42:27,175
as well. Obviously, I don't know, are they
1173
00:42:27,175 --> 00:42:29,494
hosting it, Luxe and Drive? Or No. They're
1174
00:42:29,494 --> 00:42:31,494
not. That is a show that I've watched
1175
00:42:31,494 --> 00:42:34,609
many times that, has very good audio quality.
1176
00:42:34,750 --> 00:42:37,389
So they're obviously thinking about their audio quality.
1177
00:42:37,389 --> 00:42:39,710
And that's the other metric here too, is
1178
00:42:39,710 --> 00:42:42,109
that if you're a Vimeo first creator, you
1179
00:42:42,109 --> 00:42:44,750
tend to not think about audio first from
1180
00:42:44,750 --> 00:42:47,744
an audio quality standpoint. And I'm seeing people
1181
00:42:47,965 --> 00:42:49,885
kind of move away from the big boom
1182
00:42:49,885 --> 00:42:50,385
microphones,
1183
00:42:51,085 --> 00:42:53,405
which I would think maybe makes the audio
1184
00:42:53,405 --> 00:42:55,565
less important. This was an issue, I think,
1185
00:42:55,565 --> 00:42:58,445
for broadcast television too, where they everybody on
1186
00:42:58,445 --> 00:42:59,425
broadcast television,
1187
00:42:59,804 --> 00:43:02,570
uses hidden mics or lavaliers or something like
1188
00:43:02,570 --> 00:43:05,210
that, or they use boom mics or that
1189
00:43:05,210 --> 00:43:06,030
kind of stuff.
1190
00:43:06,410 --> 00:43:08,570
It does compromise on the auto quality a
1191
00:43:08,570 --> 00:43:11,150
little bit. So sorry. I'm on the lavalier.
1192
00:43:11,289 --> 00:43:13,050
No. It's okay. I'm your audio. So it
1193
00:43:13,050 --> 00:43:15,135
sounds great. I've got lavaliers here too. I've
1194
00:43:15,135 --> 00:43:16,974
got a shotgun mic here too. I tend
1195
00:43:16,974 --> 00:43:18,894
to not use it very often, but and
1196
00:43:18,894 --> 00:43:21,135
then the the number nine on the list
1197
00:43:21,135 --> 00:43:23,474
is On Purpose with, Jay Shetty,
1198
00:43:23,934 --> 00:43:26,574
which that certainly started out as a strong
1199
00:43:26,574 --> 00:43:29,309
audio podcast. I believe he's doing video, but
1200
00:43:29,309 --> 00:43:31,230
I don't know that I watch Jay Shetty.
1201
00:43:31,230 --> 00:43:32,909
Well, no. I take that back. I think
1202
00:43:32,909 --> 00:43:35,469
I have seen Jay on on YouTube before.
1203
00:43:35,469 --> 00:43:38,190
And then, Tucker Carlson brings out the And
1204
00:43:38,190 --> 00:43:40,269
he was definitely video first. Matter of fact,
1205
00:43:40,269 --> 00:43:43,514
he was video first on Twitter, Eck, before
1206
00:43:43,514 --> 00:43:45,434
the show made it over. But I mean,
1207
00:43:45,434 --> 00:43:47,275
when he came in with his show, the
1208
00:43:47,275 --> 00:43:50,155
Tucker Carlson Show, it initially launched before it
1209
00:43:50,155 --> 00:43:52,715
was on Apple or Spotify or anywhere else.
1210
00:43:52,715 --> 00:43:56,159
It was original episodes were launched on Eck.
1211
00:43:56,319 --> 00:43:58,400
Oh, yeah. Yeah. That's true. I do remember
1212
00:43:58,400 --> 00:44:00,400
that, and he got huge numbers doing this
1213
00:44:00,400 --> 00:44:02,480
too. And, I also know that he has
1214
00:44:02,480 --> 00:44:05,299
a popular audio version too. He's a very
1215
00:44:05,440 --> 00:44:08,414
prolific ad seller into his audio podcast. Let's
1216
00:44:08,414 --> 00:44:09,614
not just put it to you that way.
1217
00:44:09,614 --> 00:44:12,015
He's well monetized on the audio side is
1218
00:44:12,015 --> 00:44:14,015
what I would say. They they learn from
1219
00:44:14,015 --> 00:44:16,255
Alex Jones. Oh, yeah. Right. Yeah. So let
1220
00:44:16,255 --> 00:44:18,015
me scroll down the the list. I don't
1221
00:44:18,015 --> 00:44:19,295
know if this one so I think the
1222
00:44:19,295 --> 00:44:22,175
one up here was globally for Spotify. This
1223
00:44:22,175 --> 00:44:24,150
one the next one on the list is
1224
00:44:24,389 --> 00:44:25,690
Spotify top podcasts,
1225
00:44:26,309 --> 00:44:28,469
in The US. It looks like Joe Rogan
1226
00:44:28,469 --> 00:44:29,369
again, obviously,
1227
00:44:29,909 --> 00:44:32,949
and then Theo Vonn, number two. So Theo
1228
00:44:32,949 --> 00:44:35,029
Vonn is very, very strong in The US,
1229
00:44:35,029 --> 00:44:36,614
but not so much outside of The US.
1230
00:44:36,695 --> 00:44:39,175
Well, it's interesting. Theo is number two here,
1231
00:44:39,175 --> 00:44:41,414
and and he was on the YouTube list,
1232
00:44:41,414 --> 00:44:43,974
but he isn't in Apple's top 10 list.
1233
00:44:43,974 --> 00:44:46,695
Interesting. Mel Robbins is. Mel Robbins is third
1234
00:44:46,695 --> 00:44:48,454
in the Apple list along with this. It
1235
00:44:48,454 --> 00:44:50,569
does make you wonder, Rob, if it's,
1236
00:44:51,010 --> 00:44:52,949
it's kind of an age group demographic
1237
00:44:53,250 --> 00:44:55,250
issue for him because because I know a
1238
00:44:55,250 --> 00:44:57,889
lot of younger people tend to listen to
1239
00:44:57,889 --> 00:45:00,130
Spotify more than they listen to Apple Podcasts.
1240
00:45:00,130 --> 00:45:01,329
So I don't know if that could make
1241
00:45:01,329 --> 00:45:03,170
a difference here. And I think Theo now
1242
00:45:03,170 --> 00:45:05,714
is definitely more video focused. Yeah. I think
1243
00:45:05,714 --> 00:45:06,914
that that has a lot to do with
1244
00:45:06,914 --> 00:45:09,154
it too. Yeah. And caller daddy's out on
1245
00:45:09,154 --> 00:45:11,875
the list. Mel Robin, crime junkie. So it's,
1246
00:45:12,114 --> 00:45:14,275
Sean Ryan that even though it looks like
1247
00:45:14,275 --> 00:45:15,795
the Tucker Carlson show is a little more
1248
00:45:15,795 --> 00:45:16,860
popular in The US,
1249
00:45:17,500 --> 00:45:19,900
and then The Daily pops up there. I
1250
00:45:19,900 --> 00:45:21,660
would have thought that The Daily would have
1251
00:45:21,660 --> 00:45:23,980
been higher on the list than that, but
1252
00:45:23,980 --> 00:45:27,180
that's interesting. And the Huberman Labs show and
1253
00:45:27,420 --> 00:45:29,900
Well, The Daily is number two in Apple's
1254
00:45:29,900 --> 00:45:32,474
list. Gotta remember, this is Spotify. So Spotify's
1255
00:45:32,614 --> 00:45:35,255
list is a little bit different, more recent
1256
00:45:35,255 --> 00:45:37,514
shows. I don't know. So Yeah. And then
1257
00:45:37,735 --> 00:45:38,855
number 10 is,
1258
00:45:39,335 --> 00:45:41,014
Good Hang with Amy Poehler.
1259
00:45:41,335 --> 00:45:43,655
So she's cracked the top 10 in The
1260
00:45:43,655 --> 00:45:46,299
US for top podcast on Spotify. Let's jump
1261
00:45:46,299 --> 00:45:48,619
to talking in the last ten minutes of
1262
00:45:48,619 --> 00:45:50,779
the show or so. Let's talk about what
1263
00:45:50,779 --> 00:45:53,679
the forecasts are looking like for, advertising
1264
00:45:53,980 --> 00:45:56,779
spend globally and in The US. Now there's
1265
00:45:56,779 --> 00:46:00,460
always dueling numbers, isn't there? I go off
1266
00:46:00,460 --> 00:46:01,875
of the numbers from the IAB.
1267
00:46:02,355 --> 00:46:04,755
The IAB numbers to me are are more
1268
00:46:04,755 --> 00:46:06,755
of the gold standard of what's being spent
1269
00:46:06,755 --> 00:46:09,074
because the IAB, well, one, it works with
1270
00:46:09,074 --> 00:46:09,574
PwC,
1271
00:46:10,034 --> 00:46:12,514
this trusted source. And then they go and
1272
00:46:12,514 --> 00:46:14,369
they actually reach out to to all of
1273
00:46:14,369 --> 00:46:16,549
the different ad network and agencies
1274
00:46:16,849 --> 00:46:18,929
in the podcast space and collect that data
1275
00:46:18,929 --> 00:46:20,150
and anonymously
1276
00:46:20,529 --> 00:46:22,849
well, so that it's not nobody knows who
1277
00:46:22,929 --> 00:46:25,429
whose numbers are what. But because of that,
1278
00:46:25,489 --> 00:46:27,510
I tend to think the the the PwC
1279
00:46:27,889 --> 00:46:30,585
IAB numbers are the the gold standard. And
1280
00:46:30,644 --> 00:46:32,724
and they had 2024
1281
00:46:32,724 --> 00:46:34,585
was around 2,400,000,000.0,
1282
00:46:34,885 --> 00:46:36,965
for ads in The US. That's the number
1283
00:46:36,965 --> 00:46:40,265
I go by. So is that, for 2020,
1284
00:46:40,805 --> 00:46:42,690
four? Is that what you 2024.
1285
00:46:42,690 --> 00:46:44,609
'4. Okay. Yeah. You know, the date that
1286
00:46:44,609 --> 00:46:47,349
I pulled here, I pulled from chat GPT.
1287
00:46:47,489 --> 00:46:49,329
It it went and looked at all the
1288
00:46:49,329 --> 00:46:51,730
all the sources, pulled it into create this.
1289
00:46:51,730 --> 00:46:53,569
So it depends on where you pull it,
1290
00:46:53,569 --> 00:46:56,069
how you make the request, and what platforms,
1291
00:46:57,045 --> 00:46:58,964
it's pulling it from because there's a lot
1292
00:46:58,964 --> 00:47:01,605
of difference in different projections that are out
1293
00:47:01,605 --> 00:47:04,425
there. Right. There was definitely a big increase
1294
00:47:04,484 --> 00:47:05,445
in 2024
1295
00:47:05,445 --> 00:47:06,644
versus 2023
1296
00:47:06,644 --> 00:47:07,684
with 2023
1297
00:47:07,684 --> 00:47:09,125
being down. But a lot of people are
1298
00:47:09,125 --> 00:47:12,440
forgetting is twenty twenty three, four, we saw
1299
00:47:12,440 --> 00:47:13,980
the whole iOS 17
1300
00:47:14,359 --> 00:47:16,119
issue and that hit and that caused some
1301
00:47:16,119 --> 00:47:16,619
issues.
1302
00:47:17,159 --> 00:47:20,119
Machine spend shows numbers dropped, especially ones that
1303
00:47:20,119 --> 00:47:22,760
were selling back catalog. 2025,
1304
00:47:22,760 --> 00:47:24,905
from everybody that I've talked with in the
1305
00:47:24,905 --> 00:47:26,984
space, is going it sounds like it's going
1306
00:47:26,984 --> 00:47:28,984
to be a much better year than 2024
1307
00:47:28,984 --> 00:47:31,545
was. So I think we'll see above that
1308
00:47:31,545 --> 00:47:32,925
2,500,000,000,
1309
00:47:33,304 --> 00:47:34,984
number in 2025
1310
00:47:34,984 --> 00:47:38,150
when the IB releases those numbers come July
1311
00:47:38,210 --> 00:47:40,549
or next year. That will be a forecast.
1312
00:47:40,690 --> 00:47:42,389
That'll be more of a precise
1313
00:47:42,690 --> 00:47:45,670
actual number. Right. Yeah. Yeah. It's interesting. The
1314
00:47:45,730 --> 00:47:48,210
resource that you share, with me, Rob, says
1315
00:47:48,210 --> 00:47:49,429
that the North American
1316
00:47:49,730 --> 00:47:52,230
podcast market is projected to reach
1317
00:47:52,545 --> 00:47:55,204
65,760,000,000.00
1318
00:47:55,585 --> 00:47:57,204
by 2033.
1319
00:47:57,425 --> 00:47:59,664
Yeah. And and I was sharing that as
1320
00:47:59,664 --> 00:48:02,324
an example of what not to believe
1321
00:48:02,704 --> 00:48:04,625
from from AI. We were gonna talk a
1322
00:48:04,625 --> 00:48:06,784
little about AI, and and I wanted to
1323
00:48:06,784 --> 00:48:09,449
do an example. So I just said to,
1324
00:48:09,449 --> 00:48:10,890
well, I won't throw any of the AI's
1325
00:48:10,890 --> 00:48:11,929
on the bus, but I said to one
1326
00:48:11,929 --> 00:48:13,769
of the AI's, what are the three top
1327
00:48:13,769 --> 00:48:15,690
news items in the last two weeks with
1328
00:48:15,690 --> 00:48:17,849
regards to the podcasting space and the business
1329
00:48:17,849 --> 00:48:18,510
of podcasting?
1330
00:48:19,050 --> 00:48:21,449
And it was one about video podcasts, and
1331
00:48:21,449 --> 00:48:23,234
it was one about podcast mergers, he does.
1332
00:48:23,234 --> 00:48:25,154
And then there was one North American podcast
1333
00:48:25,154 --> 00:48:28,114
mark rejected to reach 65,760,000,000
1334
00:48:28,114 --> 00:48:29,315
by 2033,
1335
00:48:29,315 --> 00:48:31,315
and stating that in 2024,
1336
00:48:31,315 --> 00:48:32,594
it was 10,500,000,000.0.
1337
00:48:32,594 --> 00:48:34,835
There is no scenario at all that you'd
1338
00:48:34,835 --> 00:48:36,630
get anywhere close to those numbers.
1339
00:48:37,029 --> 00:48:40,009
And no, those numbers are just completely BS.
1340
00:48:40,710 --> 00:48:42,630
Looking up, there's a couple of unfortunately, there's
1341
00:48:42,630 --> 00:48:44,389
a couple of bad articles out there. And
1342
00:48:44,389 --> 00:48:46,230
I put in I took out the report
1343
00:48:46,230 --> 00:48:48,309
profiles, players, like and I I took their
1344
00:48:48,309 --> 00:48:50,485
names out. Out. NR1, name redacted one, name
1345
00:48:50,485 --> 00:48:52,644
redacted two, because I know one of those
1346
00:48:52,644 --> 00:48:53,864
two that was redacted
1347
00:48:54,164 --> 00:48:56,244
is paying for fake downloads, you know, for
1348
00:48:56,244 --> 00:48:58,324
the whole network. So you can't take anything
1349
00:48:58,324 --> 00:49:00,724
that they say serious. Right. Yeah. Yeah. We
1350
00:49:00,724 --> 00:49:01,619
kicked a bunch of their
1351
00:49:03,619 --> 00:49:03,762
shows off. So I I know for sure
1352
00:49:03,762 --> 00:49:04,519
that one of them,
1353
00:49:04,900 --> 00:49:06,440
no. Numbers are BS.
1354
00:49:07,059 --> 00:49:08,920
And Yeah. And it's best what they're including
1355
00:49:09,059 --> 00:49:10,500
too. I know that there's been a lot
1356
00:49:10,500 --> 00:49:13,539
of people sharing numbers that are maybe trying
1357
00:49:13,539 --> 00:49:14,440
to roll in,
1358
00:49:15,220 --> 00:49:16,360
YouTube numbers
1359
00:49:16,755 --> 00:49:19,635
right now, or they're adding different types of
1360
00:49:19,635 --> 00:49:22,775
advertising that may be somewhat related to podcasting
1361
00:49:23,154 --> 00:49:24,674
into the numbers to make Even if you
1362
00:49:24,674 --> 00:49:27,094
include the number bigger. Even if you included
1363
00:49:27,234 --> 00:49:30,210
the equipment that goes into people's podcast gear,
1364
00:49:30,210 --> 00:49:32,610
the houses that go around their gear, you're
1365
00:49:32,610 --> 00:49:34,130
still not gonna get to the numbers that
1366
00:49:34,210 --> 00:49:35,969
Yeah. It's their the amount of money they
1367
00:49:35,969 --> 00:49:38,769
spent on their office ludio. Right? Yeah. So
1368
00:49:38,769 --> 00:49:40,769
there's lots of ways that you can you
1369
00:49:40,769 --> 00:49:42,869
can spend the these numbers. And,
1370
00:49:43,329 --> 00:49:45,554
but the big takeaway for for me on
1371
00:49:45,554 --> 00:49:47,635
this, and and we talked about this a
1372
00:49:47,635 --> 00:49:49,155
lot in the past on the on the
1373
00:49:49,155 --> 00:49:49,655
show,
1374
00:49:50,034 --> 00:49:51,875
is that the growth in the in this
1375
00:49:51,875 --> 00:49:54,355
side of podcasting has not really been,
1376
00:49:54,675 --> 00:49:56,614
very strong for many years.
1377
00:49:56,994 --> 00:50:00,659
It's been kind of laboring at this $22,000,000,000
1378
00:50:00,659 --> 00:50:01,940
mark for many years.
1379
00:50:02,739 --> 00:50:04,260
And and I know it has a lot
1380
00:50:04,260 --> 00:50:05,480
of people in the industry
1381
00:50:05,860 --> 00:50:08,179
thinking about, well, how can we break through?
1382
00:50:08,179 --> 00:50:10,739
Right? There's a lot of ad budgets that's
1383
00:50:10,739 --> 00:50:12,500
sitting out. If you look at the bottom
1384
00:50:12,500 --> 00:50:14,305
part of this screen too, I don't know
1385
00:50:14,305 --> 00:50:15,824
how accurate this is, but,
1386
00:50:16,224 --> 00:50:19,204
it says that podcasts are only 1%
1387
00:50:19,265 --> 00:50:21,505
of the total US ad spend. I don't
1388
00:50:21,505 --> 00:50:23,425
know how accurate that is. I get maybe
1389
00:50:23,425 --> 00:50:25,184
a little higher than that would be my
1390
00:50:25,184 --> 00:50:27,585
my assessment. But No. I mean, that is
1391
00:50:27,585 --> 00:50:29,019
when I look at when we look in
1392
00:50:29,019 --> 00:50:31,099
the IAB about all the ad dollars that
1393
00:50:31,099 --> 00:50:33,440
are spent in advertising in The US, podcasting
1394
00:50:33,579 --> 00:50:36,299
is still a very small percentage of that.
1395
00:50:36,299 --> 00:50:37,359
And it's growing,
1396
00:50:38,219 --> 00:50:40,155
and it we still feel podcasting
1397
00:50:41,755 --> 00:50:44,315
advertisers have an opportunity. But then on the
1398
00:50:44,315 --> 00:50:46,315
other side, some of those other mediums, if
1399
00:50:46,315 --> 00:50:48,795
you said an an hour of radio, that's
1400
00:50:48,795 --> 00:50:51,275
forty only forty four minutes of content. Right?
1401
00:50:51,275 --> 00:50:54,730
Sixteen minutes of ads. Most audio podcasts that
1402
00:50:54,730 --> 00:50:57,369
are an hour long have less than seven
1403
00:50:57,369 --> 00:50:59,369
or eight minutes of ads in that one
1404
00:50:59,369 --> 00:51:01,710
hour of content. So podcasting still,
1405
00:51:02,170 --> 00:51:04,489
has unless it's true crime, they get a
1406
00:51:04,489 --> 00:51:06,010
little bit more. But for the most part,
1407
00:51:06,010 --> 00:51:07,389
podcasts are underrepresented
1408
00:51:07,690 --> 00:51:09,445
by the amount of ads, and that's a
1409
00:51:09,445 --> 00:51:11,764
positive on why people listen to podcasts. Right?
1410
00:51:11,764 --> 00:51:13,925
Some will tell you that that sixteen minutes
1411
00:51:13,925 --> 00:51:15,684
of ads in an hour is too much,
1412
00:51:15,684 --> 00:51:17,364
and that's why they listen to podcasts. So
1413
00:51:17,364 --> 00:51:19,045
there is a balance that we have to
1414
00:51:19,045 --> 00:51:21,364
go at, and we're not gonna there are
1415
00:51:21,364 --> 00:51:22,804
some that say, hey. The best way to
1416
00:51:22,804 --> 00:51:25,260
grow ad revenue in podcasting is shove in
1417
00:51:25,260 --> 00:51:27,900
more ads. And that happens, unfortunately, for some
1418
00:51:27,900 --> 00:51:30,940
bigger shows when they sign minimum guarantee deals.
1419
00:51:30,940 --> 00:51:32,780
They they can make their minimum guarantee or
1420
00:51:32,780 --> 00:51:34,460
the company that gave them you know, promised
1421
00:51:34,460 --> 00:51:36,744
them the money is to overstuff it with
1422
00:51:36,744 --> 00:51:38,664
that. Still load it up as they say.
1423
00:51:38,664 --> 00:51:39,565
Right? Right.
1424
00:51:40,344 --> 00:51:42,505
Luckily, there's still quite a few podcasts that
1425
00:51:42,505 --> 00:51:44,184
push back on that and say no. That's
1426
00:51:44,184 --> 00:51:45,945
too much. I can't do that to my
1427
00:51:45,945 --> 00:51:47,945
audience, and that's a good thing for the
1428
00:51:47,945 --> 00:51:50,190
space that there's some restraint still. Yeah. You
1429
00:51:50,190 --> 00:51:51,949
know, I think that's the tension though. I
1430
00:51:51,949 --> 00:51:53,949
would say that the industry has really been
1431
00:51:53,949 --> 00:51:55,710
discussing this and I hear on a few
1432
00:51:55,710 --> 00:51:57,550
other podcasts and there there's a lot of
1433
00:51:57,550 --> 00:52:00,030
other podcasts about podcasting now that are really
1434
00:52:00,030 --> 00:52:01,974
drilled in and focused on the business side,
1435
00:52:01,974 --> 00:52:03,894
and I try and listen to those as
1436
00:52:03,894 --> 00:52:04,775
much as I can.
1437
00:52:05,335 --> 00:52:07,414
And and it does give me the impression
1438
00:52:07,414 --> 00:52:09,815
that the advertisers were kinda holding back somewhat,
1439
00:52:09,815 --> 00:52:11,894
and I'm not quite sure that there's a
1440
00:52:11,894 --> 00:52:14,135
good rational reason for that. I I think
1441
00:52:14,135 --> 00:52:15,989
that they think that they're not able to
1442
00:52:15,989 --> 00:52:18,550
get the the detail on the data that
1443
00:52:18,550 --> 00:52:20,150
they would like that they get from the
1444
00:52:20,150 --> 00:52:21,130
streaming services,
1445
00:52:21,989 --> 00:52:23,210
of time spent listening,
1446
00:52:23,590 --> 00:52:25,849
how many of the ads were actually heard,
1447
00:52:25,989 --> 00:52:28,469
what you know, those kind of metrics that
1448
00:52:28,469 --> 00:52:29,929
is difficult in podcasts
1449
00:52:30,405 --> 00:52:32,744
to deliver that level and that granularity
1450
00:52:33,125 --> 00:52:36,005
of detail. I know that the attribution part
1451
00:52:36,005 --> 00:52:38,664
has been, a huge component of the pushback
1452
00:52:38,885 --> 00:52:41,364
as well and getting that accurate and things
1453
00:52:41,364 --> 00:52:42,960
like that. And that's what's really, I think,
1454
00:52:43,039 --> 00:52:45,280
pushing the industry more and more to think
1455
00:52:45,280 --> 00:52:46,099
about HLS,
1456
00:52:46,639 --> 00:52:48,739
as a as a replacement for downloads,
1457
00:52:49,440 --> 00:52:52,239
is to try and cater to what these
1458
00:52:52,239 --> 00:52:52,739
advertisers
1459
00:52:53,119 --> 00:52:54,019
brands are
1460
00:52:54,320 --> 00:52:56,800
are pushing for, which is these deeper levels
1461
00:52:56,800 --> 00:52:59,594
of metrics that are only without Apple support.
1462
00:52:59,594 --> 00:53:02,795
Big platforms. Without Apple support, doesn't. Yeah. That's
1463
00:53:02,795 --> 00:53:05,195
the real run here is is it what's
1464
00:53:05,195 --> 00:53:07,755
ironic about it is that I believe Apple
1465
00:53:07,755 --> 00:53:09,215
was the inventor of HLS,
1466
00:53:09,994 --> 00:53:12,394
on the streaming side, but yet they're not
1467
00:53:12,394 --> 00:53:14,639
embracing it. So, you know, and it's just
1468
00:53:14,639 --> 00:53:16,420
one one of those things that the industry,
1469
00:53:16,800 --> 00:53:19,119
you know, would like to be a more
1470
00:53:19,119 --> 00:53:19,619
commercially
1471
00:53:19,920 --> 00:53:20,420
viable
1472
00:53:20,719 --> 00:53:22,400
media. Right? I mean, if you think about
1473
00:53:22,400 --> 00:53:25,215
how big even the radio advertising market was
1474
00:53:25,454 --> 00:53:28,175
dramatically bigger than the podcast market, even though
1475
00:53:28,175 --> 00:53:30,414
you could make a case that we're as
1476
00:53:30,414 --> 00:53:32,655
bigger on talk I think we're equal to
1477
00:53:32,655 --> 00:53:34,655
your radio. We're bigger than talk radio. We
1478
00:53:34,655 --> 00:53:36,494
crossed that three years ago. Three years ago,
1479
00:53:36,494 --> 00:53:37,775
we we crossed it in The US where
1480
00:53:37,775 --> 00:53:40,469
there's more people listening weekly to podcasts than
1481
00:53:40,469 --> 00:53:43,670
talk radio. Right. But that hasn't equated to
1482
00:53:43,670 --> 00:53:45,449
the same equal revenue
1483
00:53:45,829 --> 00:53:47,670
Oh, no. On the ad spend side, but
1484
00:53:47,670 --> 00:53:49,750
that could get get back to ad loads
1485
00:53:49,750 --> 00:53:51,269
too. You know? And if you look at
1486
00:53:51,269 --> 00:53:52,949
some numbers that I've seen over the last
1487
00:53:52,949 --> 00:53:54,695
couple of years with iHeartRadio,
1488
00:53:55,555 --> 00:53:58,434
a lot of their podcasts have achieved the
1489
00:53:58,434 --> 00:54:01,315
trophy of 16 and ad of ads on
1490
00:54:01,315 --> 00:54:02,055
their podcast.
1491
00:54:02,594 --> 00:54:03,094
Yeah.
1492
00:54:03,394 --> 00:54:05,394
Ass on the trophy you wanna have. But,
1493
00:54:05,394 --> 00:54:07,315
you know, it it fits with your broadcast
1494
00:54:07,315 --> 00:54:09,575
model. Right? So if you're trying to replace
1495
00:54:09,869 --> 00:54:12,429
that revenue, which I think increasingly the the
1496
00:54:12,429 --> 00:54:14,109
radio side would like to do, I can
1497
00:54:14,109 --> 00:54:16,190
see why they went there. Right? And then
1498
00:54:16,190 --> 00:54:18,109
to kind of move in to talk a
1499
00:54:18,109 --> 00:54:19,949
little about AI, you know,
1500
00:54:20,349 --> 00:54:22,269
iHeart is a good example of a platform
1501
00:54:22,269 --> 00:54:23,315
that's incorporating,
1502
00:54:24,014 --> 00:54:25,074
AI generated,
1503
00:54:25,614 --> 00:54:26,335
host reads.
1504
00:54:26,815 --> 00:54:28,734
So I think they're playing around with that
1505
00:54:28,734 --> 00:54:29,234
technology.
1506
00:54:29,534 --> 00:54:31,295
And then here's the thing about AI generated
1507
00:54:31,295 --> 00:54:33,054
host reads. If it doesn't say at the
1508
00:54:33,054 --> 00:54:35,049
beginning of the host read that it is
1509
00:54:35,049 --> 00:54:37,049
AI generated, it is in violation of the
1510
00:54:37,049 --> 00:54:37,549
FTC,
1511
00:54:38,329 --> 00:54:40,730
rules. And the FTC has been very straightforward
1512
00:54:40,730 --> 00:54:42,250
on that, that this is you need to
1513
00:54:42,250 --> 00:54:44,730
state that. And and FTC and you'll be
1514
00:54:44,730 --> 00:54:46,409
like, oh, well, the FTC won't correct. Yeah.
1515
00:54:46,409 --> 00:54:48,170
Ask Paris Hilton how that worked out for
1516
00:54:48,170 --> 00:54:51,295
her. Yeah. Right. Not fully stating things. So
1517
00:54:51,295 --> 00:54:53,715
people that are doing these AI generated ads
1518
00:54:53,775 --> 00:54:55,135
and are not and I don't know if
1519
00:54:55,135 --> 00:54:57,054
iHeart's doing it or not, are not saying
1520
00:54:57,054 --> 00:54:59,775
that announced that they're rolling it out with
1521
00:54:59,775 --> 00:55:00,914
a content platform,
1522
00:55:01,454 --> 00:55:03,614
that that enables it. So Yeah. Yeah. They'll
1523
00:55:03,614 --> 00:55:05,635
actually train on the host's
1524
00:55:05,989 --> 00:55:08,230
voice. Beginning of that ad, it has to
1525
00:55:08,230 --> 00:55:10,869
say, this is an AI generated ad. Uh-huh.
1526
00:55:10,869 --> 00:55:12,630
It has to say that. If it does
1527
00:55:12,630 --> 00:55:14,089
not state that clearly,
1528
00:55:14,389 --> 00:55:14,889
unambiguously,
1529
00:55:15,349 --> 00:55:15,849
upfront,
1530
00:55:16,150 --> 00:55:19,454
they can and will likely get fined. Yeah.
1531
00:55:19,454 --> 00:55:20,974
So and I also think, you know, I'm
1532
00:55:20,974 --> 00:55:23,375
increasingly hearing this, and I'm sure you are
1533
00:55:23,375 --> 00:55:25,715
too, Rob, that, there's people
1534
00:55:26,015 --> 00:55:26,494
like,
1535
00:55:26,894 --> 00:55:28,595
Elon Musk is a good example,
1536
00:55:29,135 --> 00:55:31,454
that have come out publicly here recently to
1537
00:55:31,454 --> 00:55:33,590
state that he thinks that pretty much
1538
00:55:33,970 --> 00:55:36,369
all content will be generated by AI within
1539
00:55:36,369 --> 00:55:38,530
five years. Yeah. I don't see that. That
1540
00:55:38,530 --> 00:55:40,230
may be a forward looking statement,
1541
00:55:40,610 --> 00:55:42,210
of what he would like to see, but
1542
00:55:42,210 --> 00:55:44,130
that may not be what actually comes to
1543
00:55:44,130 --> 00:55:46,610
pass. Not everything that Elon says comes to
1544
00:55:46,610 --> 00:55:47,864
pass. So And
1545
00:55:48,644 --> 00:55:50,325
he he says it from a perspective of
1546
00:55:50,325 --> 00:55:52,965
a company creating AI generated content. Right. Exactly.
1547
00:55:53,125 --> 00:55:53,625
AI
1548
00:55:54,325 --> 00:55:56,485
from Grak. Well, it's the same thing that
1549
00:55:56,485 --> 00:55:58,744
that we're hearing from YouTube too, or YouTube
1550
00:55:59,125 --> 00:56:01,125
kind of made this announcement that they're gonna
1551
00:56:01,125 --> 00:56:03,550
go after AI generated content and take it
1552
00:56:03,550 --> 00:56:04,909
down and all that stuff like that. But
1553
00:56:04,909 --> 00:56:06,829
if you really drill into what they did
1554
00:56:06,829 --> 00:56:08,989
say is that they're they're only going after
1555
00:56:08,989 --> 00:56:11,550
certain types of AI generated content that they
1556
00:56:11,550 --> 00:56:13,010
think is not valuable,
1557
00:56:13,309 --> 00:56:15,664
and they want people to use the
1558
00:56:16,285 --> 00:56:18,385
YouTube AI generated content option.
1559
00:56:18,844 --> 00:56:20,605
And I've listened to more than a few,
1560
00:56:20,605 --> 00:56:23,164
probably too many AI generated podcasts, and they
1561
00:56:23,164 --> 00:56:24,844
are heartless, and they are soulless, and you
1562
00:56:24,844 --> 00:56:26,684
can tell. And after you listen to them,
1563
00:56:26,684 --> 00:56:28,545
the best thing they are for is ASMR.
1564
00:56:28,605 --> 00:56:29,529
It's It's a great way to put you
1565
00:56:29,529 --> 00:56:31,289
to sleep. Right, Ro? Yeah. They just I
1566
00:56:31,289 --> 00:56:32,969
mean, they I'm sure they'll get better at
1567
00:56:32,969 --> 00:56:34,969
some point, but there is just some part
1568
00:56:34,969 --> 00:56:37,609
of the emotion that's missing, the spontaneity, the
1569
00:56:37,609 --> 00:56:40,170
mistakes that are missing there. And it's like
1570
00:56:40,170 --> 00:56:42,329
where you see that robot that almost looks
1571
00:56:42,329 --> 00:56:43,849
human but is not quite is the creepiest
1572
00:56:43,849 --> 00:56:44,599
of the
1573
00:56:45,985 --> 00:56:48,465
Perfectly looking, that's okay. But if it's almost
1574
00:56:48,465 --> 00:56:49,824
there, that's where the creep factor is in.
1575
00:56:49,824 --> 00:56:51,744
And that's right now, that's where a lot
1576
00:56:51,744 --> 00:56:53,905
of the AI generated slop, and I'll call
1577
00:56:53,905 --> 00:56:56,065
it AI generated slop, so that that one
1578
00:56:56,065 --> 00:56:57,744
company can be mad. But that's where a
1579
00:56:57,744 --> 00:56:59,985
lot of AI generated slop comes in right
1580
00:56:59,985 --> 00:57:01,960
now. It's it's creepy. And you listen to
1581
00:57:01,960 --> 00:57:05,000
it, and it is there is a tone
1582
00:57:05,000 --> 00:57:07,500
to it that is very unsettling.
1583
00:57:07,880 --> 00:57:09,960
Right. So I've heard some that are fairly
1584
00:57:09,960 --> 00:57:12,599
fairly convincing, but usually you can tell. I
1585
00:57:12,599 --> 00:57:14,519
don't know. It's it's been my experience. I
1586
00:57:14,519 --> 00:57:15,960
don't think it's got to a point where
1587
00:57:15,960 --> 00:57:18,734
it's not easy to tell. Yeah. Some of
1588
00:57:18,734 --> 00:57:20,994
it may get there at some point. Right.
1589
00:57:21,054 --> 00:57:22,414
Some of it's great if you're just trying
1590
00:57:22,414 --> 00:57:24,175
to get some information and you wanna listen,
1591
00:57:24,175 --> 00:57:25,654
you don't have time to read. Right? But
1592
00:57:25,775 --> 00:57:26,014
Yeah.
1593
00:57:26,574 --> 00:57:28,974
Me that's no different than going into a
1594
00:57:28,974 --> 00:57:31,054
blog post and then hitting the pulling down
1595
00:57:31,054 --> 00:57:32,130
on your iPad, and it dictates
1596
00:57:33,650 --> 00:57:35,809
Yeah. And I think that the other use
1597
00:57:35,809 --> 00:57:37,829
that we'll probably likely see is,
1598
00:57:38,289 --> 00:57:40,849
AI will generate content that humans would not.
1599
00:57:40,849 --> 00:57:42,849
Or now granted, you you could put all
1600
00:57:42,849 --> 00:57:45,295
sorts of different kind of measures on that
1601
00:57:45,295 --> 00:57:47,454
of what a a human would not create,
1602
00:57:47,454 --> 00:57:49,775
but I think it's this combination of speed
1603
00:57:49,775 --> 00:57:52,015
to creation is one aspect of it. And
1604
00:57:52,015 --> 00:57:53,454
then also the,
1605
00:57:53,775 --> 00:57:54,914
topics or
1606
00:57:55,215 --> 00:57:56,699
niche niching down
1607
00:57:57,179 --> 00:57:59,440
to a granular level that would be beyond
1608
00:57:59,579 --> 00:58:02,300
any human creator that they would wanna do
1609
00:58:02,300 --> 00:58:02,800
organically.
1610
00:58:03,420 --> 00:58:05,500
And I think that's kinda what the the
1611
00:58:05,500 --> 00:58:06,000
Inception
1612
00:58:06,300 --> 00:58:08,859
AI, platform is is doing. And so they're
1613
00:58:08,859 --> 00:58:10,559
taking, like, one keyword
1614
00:58:10,885 --> 00:58:13,204
and building a whole series of podcasts on
1615
00:58:13,204 --> 00:58:16,005
that one topic keyword. I think I heard
1616
00:58:16,005 --> 00:58:18,825
Janine Wright say that she had a episode
1617
00:58:19,045 --> 00:58:20,025
about the killing,
1618
00:58:20,644 --> 00:58:23,559
or the assassination of Charlie Kirk out and
1619
00:58:23,559 --> 00:58:27,239
published and in the podcast catalog within ten
1620
00:58:27,239 --> 00:58:29,799
minutes of Charlie Kirk getting a sentence. So,
1621
00:58:29,799 --> 00:58:31,799
you know, telling all about it. So, you
1622
00:58:31,799 --> 00:58:34,039
know, that speed to publish is probably what
1623
00:58:34,039 --> 00:58:36,039
we're gonna see too, and that's maybe a
1624
00:58:36,039 --> 00:58:37,739
threat for the the new services.
1625
00:58:38,164 --> 00:58:40,804
That's great because now you have nobody using
1626
00:58:40,804 --> 00:58:42,965
gray matter to fact check things. Right. That
1627
00:58:42,965 --> 00:58:44,804
was the example I gave earlier where Yeah.
1628
00:58:44,885 --> 00:58:46,724
You asked AI about what's going on, and
1629
00:58:46,724 --> 00:58:49,704
they're telling you that there's 5,000,000 global podcasts,
1630
00:58:49,844 --> 00:58:52,359
and there's gonna be a sixty five, seventy
1631
00:58:52,359 --> 00:58:54,519
six billion dollars in the podcast. They had
1632
00:58:54,519 --> 00:58:55,900
space in 2033.
1633
00:58:55,960 --> 00:58:58,280
The numbers are ridiculous, and any gray matter
1634
00:58:58,280 --> 00:59:00,539
put to that would realize that. But, yeah,
1635
00:59:00,599 --> 00:59:02,519
I I didn't. And, Nessa, you're gonna get
1636
00:59:02,519 --> 00:59:04,440
a lot of the slop with where you
1637
00:59:04,440 --> 00:59:06,839
did any any thought process on it. Well,
1638
00:59:06,839 --> 00:59:08,295
that doesn't make any sense. Sense. That doesn't
1639
00:59:08,295 --> 00:59:09,594
hold water. Well, Matt,
1640
00:59:10,135 --> 00:59:12,614
run us here and said, well, welcome back
1641
00:59:12,614 --> 00:59:15,734
to the podcast airwaves, Rob. Sounds like your
1642
00:59:15,734 --> 00:59:18,454
mic source isn't the mic you wanted. Oh,
1643
00:59:18,454 --> 00:59:20,795
I'm not sure. Really? Do I sound bad?
1644
00:59:20,934 --> 00:59:23,789
No. Which Rob? Let me, go in and
1645
00:59:23,789 --> 00:59:24,750
double check my,
1646
00:59:25,469 --> 00:59:27,869
I've selected my Oh, yeah. That definitely changed
1647
00:59:27,869 --> 00:59:29,469
it. Sorry. I have an earbuds in. I
1648
00:59:29,469 --> 00:59:31,550
should have noticed that. My my Rocast was
1649
00:59:31,550 --> 00:59:33,710
so StreamYard was picking up the wrong mic.
1650
00:59:33,710 --> 00:59:35,550
That's interesting. That's what and, you know, that's
1651
00:59:35,550 --> 00:59:36,210
what Adobe,
1652
00:59:36,875 --> 00:59:39,434
sweetener is for. Right. Now my lavalier didn't
1653
00:59:39,434 --> 00:59:41,434
sound so bad after all. Right. So we
1654
00:59:41,434 --> 00:59:43,594
both sound kinda comparable to each other, so
1655
00:59:43,594 --> 00:59:45,594
that'll be good. But, yeah, I didn't I've
1656
00:59:45,594 --> 00:59:47,214
never had to set this,
1657
00:59:47,594 --> 00:59:50,099
to my RodeCaster before. So thank you, Matt,
1658
00:59:50,579 --> 00:59:52,099
for letting us know. I I wish I
1659
00:59:52,099 --> 00:59:53,780
would have known about that earlier. Yeah. That's
1660
00:59:53,780 --> 00:59:55,480
where your guest should have said something,
1661
00:59:55,780 --> 00:59:57,539
but I didn't realize it. So I was
1662
00:59:57,780 --> 01:00:00,340
That's okay. Okay. Yeah. I should always check
1663
01:00:00,340 --> 01:00:02,340
those things before and just make sure it's
1664
01:00:02,340 --> 01:00:04,420
set to the right input. So so anyway
1665
01:00:04,579 --> 01:00:06,114
well, Rob, I think it's
1666
01:00:06,414 --> 01:00:08,414
been great to to do another episode. I
1667
01:00:08,414 --> 01:00:10,335
was hoping to keep it, you know, under
1668
01:00:10,335 --> 01:00:13,214
ninety minutes. So Get two podcasters together. And,
1669
01:00:13,214 --> 01:00:14,974
you know, we're lucky. Yeah. Well, there's a
1670
01:00:14,974 --> 01:00:16,335
lot I put you at Ted. We were
1671
01:00:16,335 --> 01:00:18,255
gonna keep it under sixty. I'm like, well,
1672
01:00:18,255 --> 01:00:20,170
that that was the goal, but as you
1673
01:00:20,170 --> 01:00:21,610
can see, I didn't quite make it. I
1674
01:00:21,610 --> 01:00:23,210
think I put too much content in the
1675
01:00:23,210 --> 01:00:25,690
outline. So I'll learn from that and adjust
1676
01:00:25,690 --> 01:00:27,449
it and just make sure that I check
1677
01:00:27,449 --> 01:00:29,449
my mic input next week because that's the
1678
01:00:29,449 --> 01:00:30,885
big thing I'm trying to do here,
1679
01:00:31,364 --> 01:00:33,465
Rob, is create a a quality program,
1680
01:00:33,844 --> 01:00:36,164
that sounds great on audio, but also looks
1681
01:00:36,164 --> 01:00:38,324
great and has a good video experience too.
1682
01:00:38,324 --> 01:00:40,724
So so that's that's my goal. Yeah. And
1683
01:00:40,724 --> 01:00:42,485
and I will say this to folks. Perfect
1684
01:00:42,485 --> 01:00:44,800
audio does matter. It just has to be
1685
01:00:44,800 --> 01:00:46,000
really it has to be good, but not
1686
01:00:46,000 --> 01:00:48,319
perfect. The all in podcast is better than
1687
01:00:48,319 --> 01:00:51,039
almost number wise than almost any other podcast
1688
01:00:51,039 --> 01:00:53,199
out there, and it's just four guys on
1689
01:00:53,199 --> 01:00:55,599
Zoom. Right. And the audio is on Zoom.
1690
01:00:55,599 --> 01:00:57,644
Okay. But Right. Right. And it's not always
1691
01:00:57,644 --> 01:01:00,285
great audio quality either. So Yeah. Yeah. That's
1692
01:01:00,285 --> 01:01:02,285
true. So But Nick does what he can
1693
01:01:02,285 --> 01:01:03,485
to clean it up. So Nick, if you're
1694
01:01:03,485 --> 01:01:05,405
listening. Yeah. Yes. Off the good work. Do
1695
01:01:05,405 --> 01:01:07,724
they host on on Yes. Oh, they do.
1696
01:01:07,724 --> 01:01:09,485
Okay. That's awesome. That's one of my favorite.
1697
01:01:09,485 --> 01:01:11,269
I listen to every episode. Oh, yeah. Yeah.
1698
01:01:11,329 --> 01:01:12,530
You wanna know about what's going on in
1699
01:01:12,530 --> 01:01:13,349
the tech world?
1700
01:01:13,890 --> 01:01:16,289
Those guys have great insight and cover politics
1701
01:01:16,289 --> 01:01:18,289
and other things. Yeah. No. It's an awesome
1702
01:01:18,289 --> 01:01:20,050
show that they've had. They've really branched out
1703
01:01:20,050 --> 01:01:21,269
into a bunch of different,
1704
01:01:21,570 --> 01:01:24,130
areas too. You know, they're doing live events
1705
01:01:24,130 --> 01:01:26,264
and doing all sorts of stuff. So so
1706
01:01:26,424 --> 01:01:28,264
anyway, Rob, well, thank you for spending time
1707
01:01:28,264 --> 01:01:29,164
with me tonight.
1708
01:01:29,625 --> 01:01:31,545
I I appreciate it, and I'll get this
1709
01:01:31,545 --> 01:01:34,664
episode pushed up to the RSS feeds, and
1710
01:01:34,664 --> 01:01:35,704
we can we can,
1711
01:01:36,264 --> 01:01:39,144
start planning the the next episode. Alright. So
1712
01:01:39,224 --> 01:01:40,269
yeah. So
1713
01:01:40,730 --> 01:01:42,329
go what's that? Thank you for having me
1714
01:01:42,329 --> 01:01:42,829
on.
1715
01:01:43,130 --> 01:01:44,969
No problem. And if be sure to go
1716
01:01:44,969 --> 01:01:46,190
check out the
1717
01:01:46,650 --> 01:01:48,010
the newmediashow.com
1718
01:01:48,010 --> 01:01:48,510
website,
1719
01:01:49,289 --> 01:01:52,650
and follow Rob and I's social channels. We're
1720
01:01:52,650 --> 01:01:53,804
both easy to find.
1721
01:01:54,284 --> 01:01:56,925
Rob also has a podcast. His podcast four
1722
01:01:56,925 --> 01:01:59,405
one one is is back. And I know
1723
01:01:59,405 --> 01:02:01,804
it I was disappointing to hear that the
1724
01:02:01,804 --> 01:02:02,464
the feed,
1725
01:02:03,005 --> 01:02:06,545
is no longer publishing episodes, and and the
1726
01:02:06,760 --> 01:02:09,480
band of you and Elsie got broke up,
1727
01:02:09,480 --> 01:02:11,900
which is an unfortunate outcome for the industry.
1728
01:02:12,039 --> 01:02:14,599
Mhmm. But it's hopefully, we can bring the
1729
01:02:14,599 --> 01:02:17,239
band back together again on this show, and
1730
01:02:17,239 --> 01:02:19,934
try and make something that's helpful to to
1731
01:02:19,934 --> 01:02:22,255
people as as well. And so up next
1732
01:02:22,255 --> 01:02:23,614
at the end of the show, I'm gonna
1733
01:02:23,614 --> 01:02:24,494
play the,
1734
01:02:25,215 --> 01:02:27,954
the not the full episode of the remembering
1735
01:02:28,015 --> 01:02:30,275
of Todd Cochran, but the intro video,
1736
01:02:31,135 --> 01:02:33,160
just so we can kind of honor,
1737
01:02:33,559 --> 01:02:36,599
Todd in this new episode as we kind
1738
01:02:36,599 --> 01:02:38,119
of leave the show. But,
1739
01:02:38,599 --> 01:02:40,760
I hope to be back next week, next
1740
01:02:40,760 --> 01:02:42,539
Wednesday at 6PM Eastern,
1741
01:02:43,159 --> 01:02:45,559
for another episode of the New Media Show.
1742
01:02:45,559 --> 01:02:47,820
So thank you so much. Good night.